학술논문

IoT and Fog-Computing-Based Predictive Maintenance Model for Effective Asset Management in Industry 4.0 Using Machine Learning
Document Type
Periodical
Source
IEEE Internet of Things Journal IEEE Internet Things J. Internet of Things Journal, IEEE. 10(3):2087-2094 Feb, 2023
Subject
Computing and Processing
Communication, Networking and Broadcast Technologies
Cloud computing
Manufacturing
Industrial Internet of Things
Genetic algorithms
Resource management
Industries
Edge computing
Fog computing
industry 40
Internet of Things (IoT)
predictive maintenance
resource management
Language
ISSN
2327-4662
2372-2541
Abstract
The assets in Industry 4.0 are categorized into physical, virtual, and human. The innovation and popularization of ubiquitous computing enhance the usage of smart devices: RFID tags, QR codes, LoRa tags, etc., for asset identification and tracking. The generated data from the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) ease information visibility and process automation in Industry 4.0. Virtual assets include the data produced from IIoT. One of the applications of the industrial big data is to predict the failure of the manufacturing equipment. Predictive maintenance enables the business owner to decide, such as repairing or replacing the component before an actual failure that affects the whole production line. Therefore, Industry 4.0 requires an effective asset management to optimize the task distributions and predictive maintenance model. This article presents the genetic algorithm (GA)-based resource management integrating with machine learning for predictive maintenance in fog computing. The time, cost, and energy performance of GA along with MinMin, MaxMin, FCFS, and RoundRobin are simulated in the FogWorkflowsim. The predictive maintenance model is built in two-class logistic regression using real-time data sets. The results demonstrate that the proposed technique outperforms MinMin, MaxMin, FCFS, RoundRobin in execution time, cost, and energy usage. The execution time is 0.48% faster, 5.43% lower cost and energy usage is 28.10% lower in comparison with second-best results. The training and testing accuracy of the prediction model is 95.1% and 94.5%, respectively.