학술논문

Bistatic Radar Tracking With Significantly Improved Bistatic Range Accuracy
Document Type
Periodical
Source
IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Aerospace and Electronic Systems, IEEE Transactions on. 59(1):52-62 Feb, 2023
Subject
Aerospace
Robotics and Control Systems
Signal Processing and Analysis
Communication, Networking and Broadcast Technologies
Bistatic radar
Radar tracking
Coordinate measuring machines
Transmitters
Radar measurements
Receiving antennas
Measurement uncertainty
3-D bistatic radar
bistatic
converted measurement
coordinate transformation
Kalman filter
radar measurements
radar tracking
Language
ISSN
0018-9251
1557-9603
2371-9877
Abstract
Tracking with bistatic radar measurements is a challenging problem due to the nonlinear relationship between the radar measurements and the Cartesian coordinates, especially for long distances. This nonlinearity leads, for 3-D bistatic radar, to a nonellipsoidal measurement uncertainty region in Cartesian coordinates, similar to a thin contact lens, that causes consistency problems for a tracking filter. The recently developed conversion of the bistatic radar measurements into Cartesian coordinates enables to maintain consistency by using a converted measurement Kalman filter. However, such a filter suffers from a poor bistatic range accuracy, limiting the multitarget tracking performance in a dense environment of targets or clutter. A solution is suggested by using a filter in the measurement coordinate system and converting its results into Cartesian coordinates. Consistent Cartesian estimation is obtained together with significantly improved filtered bistatic range accuracy. The latter is important in data association, resulting in a measurement-to-track association gates that are over an order of magnitude smaller compared to the Cartesian filters. It is shown that if the data association is performed in sensor coordinates, the (Cartesian) volume of the contact lens association region is over 20 times smaller than if it is performed in Cartesian coordinates because the ellipsoid in the latter case is extremely conservative.