학술논문

Nanoflowers Versus Magnetosomes: Comparison Between Two Promising Candidates for Magnetic Hyperthermia Therapy
Document Type
Periodical
Source
IEEE Access Access, IEEE. 9:99552-99561 2021
Subject
Aerospace
Bioengineering
Communication, Networking and Broadcast Technologies
Components, Circuits, Devices and Systems
Computing and Processing
Engineered Materials, Dielectrics and Plasmas
Engineering Profession
Fields, Waves and Electromagnetics
General Topics for Engineers
Geoscience
Nuclear Engineering
Photonics and Electrooptics
Power, Energy and Industry Applications
Robotics and Control Systems
Signal Processing and Analysis
Transportation
Magnetometers
Saturation magnetization
Iron
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic hysteresis
Magnetic anisotropy
Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy
Hyperthermia
nanoparticles
X–ray diffraction
magnetic properties
Language
ISSN
2169-3536
Abstract
Magnetic Fluid Hyperthermia mediated by iron oxide nanoparticles is one of the most promising therapies for cancer treatment. Among the different candidates, magnetite and maghemite nanoparticles have revealed to be some of the most promising candidates due to both their performance and their biocompatibility. Nonetheless, up to date, the literature comparing the heating efficiency of magnetite and maghemite nanoparticles of similar size is scarce. To fill this gap, here we provide a comparison between commercial Synomag Nanoflowers (pure maghemite) and bacterial magnetosomes (pure magnetite) synthesized by the magnetotactic bacterium Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense of $\langle D \rangle \approx ~40$ –45 nm. Both types of nanoparticles exhibit a high degree of crystallinity and an excellent degree of chemical purity and stability. The structural and magnetic properties in both nanoparticle ensembles have been studied by means of X–Ray Diffraction, Transmission Electron Microscopy, X–Ray Absorption Spectroscopy, and SQUID magnetometry. The heating efficiency has been analyzed in both systems using AC magnetometry at several field amplitudes (0–88 mT) and frequencies (130, 300, and 530 kHz).