학술논문

Investigating the 59-Day Error Signal in the Mean Sea Level Derived From TOPEX/Poseidon, Jason-1, and Jason-2 Data With FES and GOT Ocean Tide Models
Document Type
Periodical
Source
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on. 56(6):3244-3255 Jun, 2018
Subject
Geoscience
Signal Processing and Analysis
Tides
Atmospheric modeling
Orbits
Satellites
Data models
Load modeling
Level measurements
oceanography
sea measurements
tides
Language
ISSN
0196-2892
1558-0644
Abstract
Since the beginning of the altimeter mission TOPEX/Poseidon (T/P), followed by Jason-1 and Jason-2 on similar orbits, and many other missions on different orbits (ERS, EnviSat, etc.), mean sea level (MSL) products became essential for the comprehension of global ocean circulation. Since early in the T/P mission, a suspicious signal, having a period of near 59 days and amplitude of roughly 5 mm, was apparent in the Global MSL record. Compared with the 4–5-mm amplitude of the annual signal, the 59-day signal has understandably attracted attention. Moreover, the same signal has been subsequently detected in Jason-1 and later in Jason-2 MSLs. In 2010, the Ocean Surface Topography Science Team (OSTST) concluded this signal as the aliasing of a higher frequency error inherited from the tide model correction: the semi-diurnal wave S2. The source of this error was mainly attributed to T/P measurements, which were assimilated in ocean tide models. When these models are used in the computation of T/P MSL, most of the error cancels. However, this error is communicated to Jason-1 and Jason-2 MSLs. In order to gather and publish the OSTST analyses on this matter, this paper first attempts to list the myriad possibilities for the puzzling 59-day error in MSL. Then, this paper goes deeper into the description of the main contributor to this list: the tide models error. Indeed, since 2010, considerable efforts have been undertaken within the ocean tide community in order to correct ocean tide S2-waves from this error, particularly in the Goddard Ocean Tide (GOT) and finite element solution (FES) latest versions. Comparing several GOT and FES versions and a pure hydrodynamic tide model, this paper assesses, quantifies, and describes a reduction of the MSL 59-day error thanks to the latest releases. These analyses also confirm that a large part of this error has its origins in the T/P mission and has contaminated ocean tide solutions and Jason-1 and Jason-2 MSLs. They also suggest that ocean tide is not the only possible vector. Jason-1 and Jason-2 MSLs contain additional 59-day error—though to a lesser extent—that may either come from the measurements themselves or from another vector.