학술논문

Development of Radial Artery Pulse Audiogram Sensing System for Fast Detection of Atrial Fibrillation and Pulse Amplitude Variation
Document Type
Periodical
Source
IEEE Access Access, IEEE. 8:178770-178781 2020
Subject
Aerospace
Bioengineering
Communication, Networking and Broadcast Technologies
Components, Circuits, Devices and Systems
Computing and Processing
Engineered Materials, Dielectrics and Plasmas
Engineering Profession
Fields, Waves and Electromagnetics
General Topics for Engineers
Geoscience
Nuclear Engineering
Photonics and Electrooptics
Power, Energy and Industry Applications
Robotics and Control Systems
Signal Processing and Analysis
Transportation
Electrocardiography
Arteries
Rhythm
Sensors
Biomedical monitoring
Signal processing algorithms
Heart beat
Atrial fibrillation
pulse audiogram
fuzzy C-means
sample entropy
pulse blood pressure
Language
ISSN
2169-3536
Abstract
Background: A new wearable pulse audiogram (PAG) of radial artery was developed with the main purpose to quickly screen atrial fibrillation (AF) and monitor pulse amplitude variation. Methods: Subjects with sinus rhythm (SR), AF, ectopic arrhythmia (EA), and a pacemaker rhythm (PM) were recruited to measure the PAG of radial artery. In total, 91 subjects were recruited: SR ( $n =45$ ), AF ( $n =21$ ), EA ( $n =11$ ), and PM ( $n =14$ ). For signal processing, the inter-pulse interval (IPI) and pulse height (PH) were extracted. Then, an automatic classification algorithm combining fuzzy c-means (FCM) or sample entropy (CEn) with an adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system was constructed. The PAG data were divided into different segment lengths (10 to 30 beats) to investigate the robustness of the algorithm in short intervals. Furthermore, linear regression was performed to evaluate the relation between the normalized IPI and PH in the AF group. Results: The identification rate of AF increased with the number of beats and decreased with the number of classified types of arrhythmia. Results of combining CEn and FCM, or of FCM alone were better than those of CEn alone. When the combined method was used for the two types of arrhythmia and the number of beats was greater than 10, the rate of successful identification was greater than 90%, validating the technique. Furthermore, for the AF group, PH increased with IPI, while the amplitude of electrocardiogram (ECG) did not. Conclusions: Results indicated that our PAG can effectively identify AF, even in a time window as short as 10 beats. In addition, PAG can monitor the trend of pulse amplitude, possibility that cannot be offered by an ECG.