학술논문

Accounting for Deformation in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery With Models: Comparison to Interventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Document Type
Periodical
Source
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on. 67(10):2934-2944 Oct, 2020
Subject
Bioengineering
Computing and Processing
Components, Circuits, Devices and Systems
Communication, Networking and Broadcast Technologies
Surgery
Satellite broadcasting
Brain modeling
Biological system modeling
Electrodes
Imaging
Data models
Brain shift
computational modeling
deep brain stimulation
image-guided neurosurgery
Language
ISSN
0018-9294
1558-2531
Abstract
The efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) depends on electrode placement accuracy, which can be jeopardized by brain shift due to burr hole and dura opening during surgery. Brain shift violates assumed rigid alignment between preoperative image and intraoperative anatomy, negatively impacting therapy. Objective: This study presents a deformation-atlas biomechanical model-based approach to address shift. Methods: Six patients, who underwent interventional magnetic resonance (iMR) image-guided DBS burr hole surgery, were studied. A patient-specific model was employed under varying surgical conditions, generating a collection of possible intraoperative shift estimations or a ‘deformation atlas.’ An inverse problem was driven by sparse measurements derived from iMR to determine an optimal fit of solutions of the atlas. This fit was then used to obtain a volumetric deformation field, which was utilized to update preoperative MR and estimate shift at surgical target region localized on iMR. Model performance was examined by quantitatively comparing intraoperative subsurface measurements to their model-predicted counterparts, and qualitatively comparing iMR, preoperative MR, and model updated MR. A nonrigid image registration was introduced as a comparator. Results: Model-based approach reduced general parenchyma shift from 8.2 ± 2.2 to 2.7 ± 1.1 mm (∼66.8% correction), and produced updated MR with better agreement to iMR than that of preoperative MR. The average model estimated shift at target region was 1.2 mm. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of a model-based shift correction strategy in DBS surgery with only sparse data. Significance: The developed strategy has the potential to complement and/or enhance current clinical approaches in addressing shift.