학술논문

Musculoskeletal Model to Predict Muscle Activity During Upper Limb Movement
Document Type
Periodical
Source
IEEE Access Access, IEEE. 9:111472-111485 2021
Subject
Aerospace
Bioengineering
Communication, Networking and Broadcast Technologies
Components, Circuits, Devices and Systems
Computing and Processing
Engineered Materials, Dielectrics and Plasmas
Engineering Profession
Fields, Waves and Electromagnetics
General Topics for Engineers
Geoscience
Nuclear Engineering
Photonics and Electrooptics
Power, Energy and Industry Applications
Robotics and Control Systems
Signal Processing and Analysis
Transportation
Muscles
Shoulder
Wrist
Task analysis
Elbow
Predictive models
Force
Muscle activity prediction
musculoskeletal model
simulation
subject-specific analysis
upper-limb
Language
ISSN
2169-3536
Abstract
Assessing biomechanics of upper limb movement is essential for guiding targeted therapy to treat conditions such as spasticity and dystonia. Targeted therapy, including injections of medications into specific muscles (e.g., lidocaine, botulinum toxin type A), requires accurate identification (activity) and contribution of as many muscles as possible. Currently, this is achieved by visual clinical assessment or using surface electromyography (sEMG). Although sEMG could provide a reasonable estimate of muscle activity for certain superficial muscles after an intense filtering process, they are unable to provide separated activity and contribution for every superficial and deep muscle. Other proposed musculoskeletal and machine learning models similarly do not provide a detailed and accurate activity of every muscle. The objective of the study is to design a subject-specific musculoskeletal model to predict the activity and contribution of each muscle pertaining to any upper limb movement with improved detail and accuracy over existing methodologies. Performance metrics were calculated for validation by comparing the predicted muscle activity with the normalized sEMG data computed from 8 superficial muscles, while the deeper muscles were not included in the validation as the sEMG is unable to provide a separated activity for those muscles. The results show that the proposed model has a mean R 2 value of 0.8190 and also indicated a statistically significant correlation ( $P < 0.0001$ ) between the calculated (normalized sEMG data) and predicted activity value. Additionally, and significantly, compared to earlier studies, the proposed model predicts the individual muscle activity and contribution of deeper muscles.