학술논문

Relationships among airborne scanning LiDAR, high resolution multispectral imagery, and ground-based inventory data in a ponderosa pine forest
Document Type
Conference
Source
IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium Geoscience and remote sensing symposium Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2002. IGARSS '02. 2002 IEEE International. 5:2912-2914 vol.5 2002
Subject
Geoscience
Signal Processing and Analysis
Laser radar
Image resolution
Multispectral imaging
Fires
Area measurement
Density measurement
Financial management
Belts
Data analysis
Soil
Language
Abstract
Estimating forest structure and stand density using remotely sensed data is important for a wide range of scientific and management goals, including assessing biogeochemical budgets (e.g. aboveground carbon storage) and determining the susceptibility of an area to catastrophic fires. The objective of this study is to determine relationships among ground-collected forest structure data, high resolution IKONOS imagery, and airborne scanning LiDAR collected at a ponderosa. pine (Pinus ponderosa) dominated site in the Black Hills of South Dakota. Ground data were collected in the summer of 2001 along four 10/spl times/140 meter belt transects. IKONOS imagery was obtained over the site on July 28, 2000, and airborne scanning discrete-return LiDAR was acquired at a nominal 2 meter post spacing (56 cm beam footprint diameter) on October 26, 2001. No thinning or fire activity occurred at the site between data collection dates. Transect data were subdivided into 10/spl times/10 meter plots and co-registered with the IKONOS and LiDAR data for analyses. A combination of IKONOS multispectral and panchromatic data was used to select image endmembers (i.e. spectrally "pure" components) of bare soil, open grass, and tree/shade. In 80% of the plots, LiDAR-derived first return canopy height agreed with field-measured maximum tree height to within 20%. On average, LiDAR-derived first return canopy height underestimated field measured maximum tree height by 3.7%. Effective tree canopy leaf area index (LAI/sub e/, a measure of canopy cover fraction) ranged from 0.3 to 2.5 among the plots. The fraction of LiDAR tree canopy returns were significantly correlated with LAI/sub e/ at the plot level (r=0.55; p