학술논문

Faster Canonical Forms for Strongly Regular Graphs
Document Type
Conference
Source
2013 IEEE 54th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2013 IEEE 54th Annual Symposium on. :157-166 Oct, 2013
Subject
General Topics for Engineers
Color
Geometry
Graphics
Educational institutions
Electronic mail
Polynomials
History
algorithms
graph isomorphism
strongly regular graphs
Language
ISSN
0272-5428
Abstract
We show that a canonical form for strongly regular (s.r.) graphs can be found in time exp(O~(n1/5)) and therefore isomorphism of s.r. graphs can be tested within the same time bound, where n is the number of vertices and the tilde hides a polylogarithmic factor. The best previous bound for testing isomorphism of s. r. graphs was exp(O~(n1/3)) (Spiel man, STOC 1996) while the bound for GI in general has been standing firmly at exp(O~(n1/2)) for three decades. (These results, too, provided canonical forms.) The previous bounds on isomorphism of s.r. graphs (Babai 1980 and Spiel man 1996) were based on the analysis of the classical individualization/refinement (I/R) heuristic. The present bound depends on a combination of a deeper analysis of the I/R heuristic with Luks's group theoretic divide-and-conquer methods following Babai-Luks (STOC 1983) and Miller (1983). Our analysis builds on Spiel man's work that brought Neumaier's 1979 classification of s.r. graphs to bear on the problem. One of Neumaier's classes, the line-graphs of Steiner 2-designs, has been eliminated as a bottleneck in recent work by the present authors (STOC'13). In the remaining hard cases, we have the benefit of Neumaier's claw bound" and its asymptotic consequences derived by Spiel man, some of which we improve via a new "clique geometry." We also prove, by an analysis of the I/R heuristic, that, with known (trivial) exceptions, s.r. graphs have exp(O~(n9/37)) automorphisms, improving Spiel man's exp(O~(n1/3)) bound. No knowledge of group theory is required for this paper. The group theoretic method is only used through an easily stated combinatorial consequence (Babai -- Luks, 1983 combined with Miller, 1983). While the bulk of this paper is joint work by the five authors, it also includes two contributions by subsets of the authors: the clique geometry [BW] and the auto orphism bound [CST]."