학술논문

Ventricular Fibrillation Threshold vs Alternating Current Shock Duration
Document Type
Conference
Source
2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC) Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE. :1257-1263 Nov, 2021
Subject
Bioengineering
Correlation
Fibrillation
Animals
Electric shock
IEC
Threshold current
Data models
Language
ISSN
2694-0604
Abstract
Introduction: International basic safety limits for utility-frequency electrical currents have long been set by the International Electrotechnical Commission 60479-1 standard. These were inspired by a linear-section plot proposed by Biegelmeier in 1980 with current given as a function of the shock duration. This famous plot has contributed to safe electrical circuit design internationally and has properly earned significant amount of respect over its 35 years of life. However, some possible areas for improvement have been suggested.Methods: We searched for all animal studies of ventricular fibrillation threshold versus duration that used a forelimb to hindlimb connection that had at least 3 durations tested. We found 6 such studies and they were then used to calculate a new C3 curve after normalizing the data.Results: A rational function model fit the animal data with r 2 = .96. Such a correlation calculation tends to underweight the smaller values, so we also correlated the log threshold values and this had a correlation of r 2 =.94.Conclusion: Existing ventricular fibrillation threshold current versus duration data can be fitted with a simple rational function. This can provide a useful update to IEC 60479-1.