학술논문

First Arrival Picking of Seismic Data Based on Trace Envelope
Document Type
Periodical
Source
IEEE Access Access, IEEE. 7:128806-128815 2019
Subject
Aerospace
Bioengineering
Communication, Networking and Broadcast Technologies
Components, Circuits, Devices and Systems
Computing and Processing
Engineered Materials, Dielectrics and Plasmas
Engineering Profession
Fields, Waves and Electromagnetics
General Topics for Engineers
Geoscience
Nuclear Engineering
Photonics and Electrooptics
Power, Energy and Industry Applications
Robotics and Control Systems
Signal Processing and Analysis
Transportation
Manuals
Transforms
Signal to noise ratio
Data processing
Mathematical model
Data mining
Receivers
Complex seismic trace
envelope
first arrival traveltime picking
Hilbert transform
instantaneous amplitude
Language
ISSN
2169-3536
Abstract
We introduce a new method for first arrival traveltime picking based on the maximum difference between adjacent points of the envelope (MDPE) of a seismic trace. The method starts by calculating the Hilbert transform of the seismic trace to generate the complex seismic trace, which consists of the real and imaginary parts of a seismic trace. After generating the complex seismic trace, the instantaneous amplitude or envelope is extracted and used to pick the first arrival traveltime. We test the proposed method on synthetic shot records. When we compared the automatically picked first arrival traveltimes using our proposed method versus those picked manually by an experienced processor, we found that our proposed method estimated the first arrival traveltimes with more than 88% picking accuracy (within 0.1 s of manual picks). Furthermore, we perform the same test on real shot records and the proposed method estimated the first arrival traveltimes with a picking accuracy of 85% (within 0.1 s of manual picks). Finally, we apply the proposed method on 58 traces extracted from a real 2D land seismic data set from southeast Texas on which first arrival traveltime was difficult to pick automatically. We compare our proposed method and the P-phase picker method against manual picks. Results show that the proposed method has a picking accuracy of 99%, while the P-phase picker method gives 83% picking accuracy (within 0.1 s of manual picks).