부산대학교 도서관

Two different self-healing approaches are studied in this work to analyze the possible contribution of each of the self-healing mechanisms at different temperatures and the possible synergetic effects between them. Thermal and mechanical properties were differently affected by the addition of each of the thermoplastic polymers. This was caused by different phase separations induced during the curing reaction in terms of size and number of the thermoplastic phase domains dispersed within the epoxy matrix and due to the different amounts of thermoplastic polymer that remain solved in the matrix. When using the vitrimeric matrix, phase separation only occurred at the nanometer scale when utilizing poly(bisphenol-A-co-epichlorohydrin) (PBAE) as a thermoplastic agent or higher contents of polycaprolactone (PCL).Self-healing capabilities showed a strong dependence on the temperature used and the type of crack. Low temperatures allowed the thermoplastic phase to flow and fill partially the cracks with moderate levels of self-healing which were only available when phases were separated. Higher temperatures allowed dynamic bonds to induce material healing reaching very high efficiencies but, more importantly, a synergic effect was observed when material was removed from the cracks. In these cases, the flow of the thermoplastic phase filled better the crack and there was an enhanced cooperation between the two healing mechanisms. At higher self-healing temperatures, materials with nanometric size phase separation enabled greater self-healing efficiencies (above 90 %) due to the vitrimeric self-healing capability while the thermoplastic phase helped fill the gaps due to material removal.