부산대학교 도서관

XiaoLang Miao,1 Yanxia Han,1 Zhenyun Wu,1 Xiaoliang Jin,1 Mei’e Niu,1 Qian Zhao,1 Xiangmin Lu2 1Department of Respiratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, People’s Republic of China; 2School of Nursing, Soochow University, Suzhou, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Mei’e Niu, Department of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 899th, Pinghai Road, Suzhou, 215006, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13812671786, Email meniu_123@163.comPurpose: To translate a disease-specific anxiety questionnaire on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and test its reliability and validity in China.Patients and Methods: The German version of the revised COPD Anxiety Questionnaire (CAF-R) was initially validated using step-by-step translation, back-translation, and cross-cultural adaptation. The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the CAF-R (CAF-R-CN) were tested among 448 patients with COPD (mean age =71.42± 9.33 years, 17.2% female) from four medical institutions in Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, using convenience sampling, from April 2022 to June 2023.Results: The CAF-R-CN included six dimensions with a total of 25 items. The item-level content validity index was 0.860– 1.000; the scale-level content validity index was 0.920. The structural validity χ2/df was 2.326, the root mean square error of approximation was 0.077, the comparative fit index was 0.924, and the Tucker–Lewis index was 0.912. The six-dimensional internal consistency index Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.696– 0.910, and the test–retest reliability was 0.949. An optimal cut-off score of 50.5 was selected with a sensitivity of 0.786 and specificity of 0.870.Conclusion: The CAF-R-CN had satisfactory reliability and validity and can be used to identify and assess anxiety in COPD patients with a Chinese cultural background.Keywords: fear, scale, specificity, chronic respiratory disease, Chinese translation, assessment