학술논문

Effect of differentiated direct‐to‐pharmacy PrEP refill visits supported with client HIV self‐testing on clinic visit time and early PrEP continuation
Document Type
article
Source
Journal of the International AIDS Society, Vol 27, Iss 3, Pp n/a-n/a (2024)
Subject
PrEP
direct‐to‐pharmacy
HIV prevention
differentiated care delivery
clinic wait time
Kenya
Immunologic diseases. Allergy
RC581-607
Language
English
ISSN
1758-2652
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Delivery of oral pre‐exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is being scaled up in Africa, but clinic‐level barriers including lengthy clinic visits may threaten client continuation on PrEP. Methods Between January 2020 and January 2022, we conducted a quasi‐experimental evaluation of differentiated direct‐to‐pharmacy PrEP refill visits at four public health HIV clinics in Kenya. Two clinics implemented the intervention package, which included direct‐to‐pharmacy for PrEP refill, client HIV self‐testing (HIVST), client navigator, and pharmacist‐led rapid risk assessment and dispensing. Two other clinics with comparable size and client volume served as contemporaneous controls with the usual clinic flow. PrEP continuation was evaluated by visit attendance and pharmacy refill records, and time and motion studies were conducted to determine time spent in the clinics. Dried blood spots were collected to test for tenofovir‐diphosphate (TFV‐DP) at random visits. We used logistic regression to assess the intervention effect on PrEP continuation and the Wilcoxon rank sum test to assess the effect on clinic time. Results Overall, 746 clients were enrolled, 366 at control clinics (76 during pre‐implementation and 290 during implementation phase), and 380 at direct‐to‐pharmacy clinics (116 during pre‐implementation and 264 during implementation phase). Prior to implementation, the intervention and control clinics were comparable on client characteristics (female: 51% vs. 47%; median age: 33 vs. 33 years) and PrEP continuation (35% vs. 37% at 1 month, and 37% vs. 39% at 3 months). The intervention reduced total time spent at the clinic by 35% (median of 51 minutes at control vs. 33 minutes at intervention clinics; p