학술논문

Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use Among Patients with Dry Eye Syndrome in Saudi Arabia: A Survey Study
Document Type
article
Source
Clinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 17, Pp 3207-3213 (2023)
Subject
dry eye
complementary medicine
alternative-medicine.
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Language
English
ISSN
1177-5483
Abstract
Ghada Awad Aljuhani,1 Rahaf Afandi,2 Aaesha A Alkayyal,2 Jana Alharbi,2 Abeer Surihan Alharbi,3 Mohammed Alsaedi,3 Haneen AlHujaili3 1Ophthalmology department, Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Madinah, Saudi Arabia; 2Medical Intern, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia; 3Ophthalmology Department, Ohud Hospital, Madinah, Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence: Ghada Awad Aljuhani, Email Ghada.aljuhani92@gmail.comIntroduction: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) includes all healthcare practices that are not part of conventional medicine. One of the most common eye disorders for visiting an ophthalmology clinic is dry eye disease (DED), and due to the increasing number of CAM used for eye conditions, 1 in 5 patients has been reported in previous studies to use CAM for eye treatment. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of CAM use among patients with (DED).Methods: A web-based survey was used to collect the data, the first part of the questionnaire was about demographic data, and the second part included a validated Arabic version of the ocular surface disease index (OSDI). The third part was about practices that alleviate DED other than conventional medicine.Results: The total sample was 282, 61 were males, and 221 were females. Most participants (48.5%) were between 25 and 44 years old, 90% were Saudi, and only 10% were non-Saudi. Of the participant, 70% reported having attained a university or higher education level. The prevalence of the use of CAM among patients with dry eye was around 85%. The most frequently reported type of CAM used among the participants was faith healing (Ruqyah) (41%). This was followed by warm compressors (37%). There was no significant correlation between the severity of OSDI and using CAM, as the p-value was 0.909.Conclusion: In conclusion, our study shows that CAM is a popular choice among patients with dry eye syndrome. Faith healing and warm compressors are the most used types of CAM. However, the lack of correlation between OSDI severity and CAM use indicates that patients may use CAM for reasons other than symptom severity. Further research is needed to explore the reasons behind CAM use and its effectiveness in managing dry eye syndrome.Keywords: dry eye, complementary medicine, alternative medicine