부산대학교 도서관

Abstract Recent studies have shown an inconsistent association between dietary niacin and cognitive function. And this remains unclear in the American outpatient population. The aim of this study was to assess whether there is an association between dietary niacin and cognitive performance in an older American population aged ≥60 years. A total of 2523 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011–2014 were enrolled. Cognitive function was assessed by the CERAD Word Learning (CERAD‐WL) test, the CERAD Delayed Recall (CERAD‐DR) test, the Animal Fluency test (AFT), and the Digit Symbol Substitution test (DSST). Cognitive impairment that meets one of the four scoring conditions listed above is defined as low cognitive function. Dietary niacin intake was obtained from 2 days of a 24‐h recall questionnaire. Based on the quartiles of dietary niacin intake, they were divided into four groups: Q1 (26.91 mg). The stability of the results was assessed using multifactorial logistic regression, restricted cubic spline (RCS) models, and sensitivity stratified analysis. More than half of the participants had cognitive impairment (52.52%). In the fully adjusted model, niacin was associated with a significantly reduced risk of cognitive impairment in Q3 and Q4 compared with the Q1 group (OR: 0.610, 95% CI: 0.403, 0.921, p = .022; OR: 0.592, 95% CI: 0.367, 0.954, p = .034). Meanwhile, niacin was negatively associated with poor cognition as assessed by the CERAD‐WL test, CERAD test, AFT, and DSST. An L‐shaped dose–response relationship between dietary niacin and cognitive function was observed in all participants (nonlinear p