학술논문

A multilaboratory comparison of calibration accuracy and the performance of external references in analytical ultracentrifugation.
Document Type
article
Author
Huaying ZhaoRodolfo GhirlandoCarlos AlfonsoFumio ArisakaIlan AttaliDavid L BainMarina M BakhtinaDonald F BeckerGregory J BedwellAhmet BekdemirTabot M D BesongCatherine BirckChad A BrautigamWilliam BrennermanOlwyn ByronAgnieszka BzowskaJonathan B ChairesCatherine T ChatonHelmut CölfenKeith D ConnaghanKimberly A CrowleyUte CurthTina DaviterWilliam L DeanAna I DíezChristine EbelDebra M EckertLeslie E EiseleEdward EisensteinPatrick EnglandCarlos EscalanteJeffrey A FaganRobert FairmanRon M FinnWolfgang FischleJosé García de la TorreJayesh GorHenning GustafssonDamien HallStephen E HardingJosé G Hernández CifreAndrew B HerrElizabeth E HowellRichard S IsaacShu-Chuan JaoDavis JoseSoon-Jong KimBashkim KokonaJack A KornblattDalibor KosekElena KrayukhinaDaniel KrzizikeEric A KusznirHyewon KwonAdam LarsonThomas M LaueAline Le RoyAndrew P LeechHauke LilieKarolin LugerJuan R Luque-OrtegaJia MaCarrie A MayErnest L MaynardAnna Modrak-WojcikYee-Foong MokNorbert MückeLuitgard Nagel-StegerGeeta J NarlikarMasanori NodaAmanda NourseTomas ObsilChad K ParkJin-Ku ParkPeter D PawelekErby E PerdueStephen J PerkinsMatthew A PeruginiCraig L PetersonMartin G PeverelliGrzegorz PiszczekGali PragPeter E PreveligeBertrand D E RaynalLenka RezabkovaKlaus RichterAlison E RingelRose RosenbergArthur J RoweArne C RuferDavid J ScottJavier G SeravalliAlexandra S SolovyovaRenjie SongDavid StauntonCaitlin StoddardKatherine StottHolger M StraussWerner W StreicherJohn P SumidaSarah G SwygertRoman H SzczepanowskiIngrid TessmerRonald T TothAshutosh TripathySusumu UchiyamaStephan F W UebelSatoru UnzaiAnna Vitlin GruberPeter H von HippelChristine WandreySzu-Huan WangSteven E WeitzelBeata Wielgus-KutrowskaCynthia WolbergerMartin WolffEdward WrightYu-Sung WuJacinta M WubbenPeter Schuck
Source
PLoS ONE, Vol 10, Iss 5, p e0126420 (2015)
Subject
Medicine
Science
Language
English
ISSN
1932-6203
Abstract
Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) is a first principles based method to determine absolute sedimentation coefficients and buoyant molar masses of macromolecules and their complexes, reporting on their size and shape in free solution. The purpose of this multi-laboratory study was to establish the precision and accuracy of basic data dimensions in AUC and validate previously proposed calibration techniques. Three kits of AUC cell assemblies containing radial and temperature calibration tools and a bovine serum albumin (BSA) reference sample were shared among 67 laboratories, generating 129 comprehensive data sets. These allowed for an assessment of many parameters of instrument performance, including accuracy of the reported scan time after the start of centrifugation, the accuracy of the temperature calibration, and the accuracy of the radial magnification. The range of sedimentation coefficients obtained for BSA monomer in different instruments and using different optical systems was from 3.655 S to 4.949 S, with a mean and standard deviation of (4.304 ± 0.188) S (4.4%). After the combined application of correction factors derived from the external calibration references for elapsed time, scan velocity, temperature, and radial magnification, the range of s-values was reduced 7-fold with a mean of 4.325 S and a 6-fold reduced standard deviation of ± 0.030 S (0.7%). In addition, the large data set provided an opportunity to determine the instrument-to-instrument variation of the absolute radial positions reported in the scan files, the precision of photometric or refractometric signal magnitudes, and the precision of the calculated apparent molar mass of BSA monomer and the fraction of BSA dimers. These results highlight the necessity and effectiveness of independent calibration of basic AUC data dimensions for reliable quantitative studies.