학술논문

Do Mass Nouns Constitute a Semantically Uniform Class?
Document Type
article
Source
Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol 26, Iss , Pp 33-47 (2002)
Subject
Grammar, Comparative and general-- Mass nouns
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
Language
English
ISSN
2378-7600
1043-3805
Abstract
Research on mass nouns has focused on concrete terms. So, are there semantic properties shared by all mass terms? We first consider concrete nouns like milk and furniture. Contra Cheng (1973), we show that they can be held to refer distributively (i.e. to apply to any part of what they apply to) only if this property is understood with a new part-relation, that of N -part. In addition, they refer cumulatively: when they apply to each of two things, they also apply to the two things considered together. We then turn to abstract mass terms like beauty and love. We find, surprisingly, that they too refer distributively and cumulatively.