학술논문
Determination of Relative Weightings for Sacroiliac Joint Pathologies in the OMERACT Juvenile Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sacroiliac Joint Score
Document Type
article
Author
Tarimobo M. Otobo; Mirkamal Tolend; Arthur B. Meyers; Iwona Sudol-Szopinska; Sayali Joshi; Jennifer Stimec; Nele Herregods; Jacob L. Jaremko; Shirley M. L. Tse; Nigil Haroon; Rahim Moineddin; Nikolay Tzaribachev; Simone Appenzeller; Michal Znajdek; Manuela Perez; Aloysius E. Ligha; Lennart Jans; Emilio J. Inarejos Clemente; Pamela Weiss; Olympia Papakonstantinou; Eva Kirkhus; Marion A. J. van Rossum; Dax G. Rumsey; John Carrino; Jonathan D. Akikusa; Philip G. Conaghan; Andrea S. Doria
Source
Journal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 12, Iss 7, p 2729 (2023)
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
12072729
2077-0383
2077-0383
Abstract
This study aims to determine the relative weights (point value) of items of the juvenile idiopathic arthritis magnetic resonance imaging-sacroiliac joint scoring system (JAMRIS-SIJ). An adaptive multicriteria decision analysis was performed using the 1000Minds web application to determine the relative weights of the items in the JAMRIS-SIJ inflammation and damage domains. Experts in imaging and rheumatology independently completed a conjoint analysis survey (CAS) to determine the point value of the measurement items of the JAMRIS-SIJ. Each CAS survey question asked the expert to compare two hypothetical patient profiles, which were otherwise similar but different at two items at a time, and to select which item showed a more severe stage of inflammation or osteochondral damage. In addition, experts ranked 14 JAMRIS-SIJ grade only or image + grade patient vignettes while blinded to the CAS-derived weights. The validity of the weighted JAMRIS-SIJ was tested by comparing the expert CAS-weighted score and the image + grade ranking method. Seventeen experts completed the CAS (11 radiologists and 6 rheumatologists). Considering the point value for inflammation domain items, osteitis (24.7%) and bone marrow edema (24.3%) had higher group-averaged percentage weights compared to inflammation in erosion cavity (16.9%), joint space enhancement (13.1%), joint space fluid (9.1%), capsulitis (7.3%), and enthesitis (4.6%). Similarly, concerning the damage domain, ankylosis (41.3%) and erosion (25.1%) showed higher group-averaged weights compared to backfill (13.9%), sclerosis (10.7%), and fat metaplasia lesion (9.1%). The Spearman correlation coefficients of the CAS-weighted vignette order and unweighted JAMRIS-SIJ grade only order vignettes for all experts were 0.79 for inflammation and 0.80 for damage. The correlations of image vignettes among imaging experts to CAS were 0.75 for inflammation and 0.90 for damage. The multicriteria decision analysis identified differences in relative weights among the JAMRIS-SIJ measurement items. The determination of the relative weights provided expert-driven score scaling and face validity for the JAMRIS-SIJ, enabling the future evaluation of its longitudinal construct validity.