학술논문

Erratum to: Measurement of jet production cross sections in deep-inelastic ep scattering at HERA
Document Type
article
Author
V. AndreevA. BaghdasaryanK. BegzsurenA. BelousovA. BolzV. BoudryG. BrandtV. BrissonD. BritzgerA. BuniatyanA. BylinkinL. BystritskayaA. J. CampbellK. B. Cantun AvilaK. CernyV. ChekelianJ. G. ContrerasJ. CvachJ. B. DaintonK. DaumC. DiaconuM. DobreV. DodonovG. EckerlinS. EgliE. ElsenL. FavartA. FedotovJ. FeltesseJ. FerenceiM. FleischerA. FomenkoE. GabathulerJ. GaylerS. GhazaryanL. GoerlichN. GogitidzeM. GouzevitchC. GrabA. GrebenyukT. GreenshawG. GrindhammerD. HaidtR. C. W. HendersonJ. HladkỳD. HoffmannR. HorisbergerT. HreusF. HuberM. JacquetX. JanssenH. JungM. KapichineJ. KatzyC. KieslingM. KleinC. KleinwortR. KoglerP. KostkaJ. KretzschmarD. KrückerK. KrügerM. P. J. LandonW. LangeP. LaycockA. LebedevS. LevonianK. LipkaB. ListJ. ListB. LobodzinskiE. MalinovskiH.-U. MartynS. J. MaxfieldA. MehtaA. B. MeyerH. MeyerJ. MeyerS. MikockiA. MorozovK. MüllerTh. NaumannP. R. NewmanC. NiebuhrG. NowakJ. E. OlssonD. OzerovC. PascaudG. D. PatelE. PerezA. PetrukhinI. PicuricH. PirumovD. PitzlR. PlačakytėR. PolifkaV. RadescuN. RaicevicT. RavdandorjP. ReimerE. RizviP. RobmannR. RoosenA. RostovtsevM. RotaruD. ŠálekD. P. C. SankeyM. SauterE. SauvanS. SchmittL. SchoeffelA. SchöningF. SefkowS. ShushkevichY. SolovievP. SopickiD. SouthV. SpaskovA. SpeckaM. StederB. StellaU. StraumannT. SykoraP. D. ThompsonD. TraynorP. TruölI. TsakovB. TseepeldorjA. ValkárováC. ValléeP. Van MechelenY. VazdikD. WegenerE. WünschJ. ŽáčekZ. ZhangR. ŽlebčíkH. ZohrabyanF. Zomer
Source
European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields, Vol 81, Iss 8, Pp 1-11 (2021)
Subject
Astrophysics
QB460-466
Nuclear and particle physics. Atomic energy. Radioactivity
QC770-798
Language
English
ISSN
1434-6044
1434-6052
Abstract
Abstract The measurement of the jet cross sections by the H1 collaboration had been compared to various predictions including the next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) QCD calculations which are corrected in this erratum for an implementation error in one of the components of the NNLO calculations. The jet data and the other predictions remain unchanged. Eight figures, one table and conclusions are adapted accordingly, exhibiting even better agreement between the corrected NNLO predictions and the jet data.