부산대학교 도서관

Single-limb balance training is integral to preventing and rehabilitating lower extremity injuries. Previous investigations have shown that when using instability devices, differences may or may not exist in the postural sway parameters during use, depending on the specific devices being assessed. Thus, this investigation sought to examine the differences between a commonly used foam pad and a novel instability device (block) in postural sway measures. Twenty-two healthy individuals with no history of lower extremity injury or neurological disorders participated in this investigation. The participants performed three single-limb static balance exercises on a force platform sampling at 120 Hz. Each condition contained three 10-s trials separated by thirty seconds. The mean CoP values of the three trials in each condition were then compared using a within-subjects repeated-measures analysis of variance. Statistically significant differences were seen in the sway area between conditions (p = 0.009), the CoP path length (p = 0.007), the peak medial–lateral CoP displacement (p = 0.004), and the average sway velocity (p = 0.007). All variables displayed similar trends whereby the control condition showed significantly lower values than both instability devices, with no differences between devices. This investigation provides supporting evidence that different instability devices may deliver similar changes to postural sway parameters compared to control conditions. The novel block instability device used in this investigation may be used similarly to the traditional foam pad in prevention and rehabilitation settings based on the absence of differences between the two devices.