학술논문

Women and health professionals’ perspectives on a conditional cash transfer programme to improve pregnancy follow-up: a qualitative analysis of the NAITRE randomised controlled study
Document Type
article
Author
Celine ChauleurJacob HannigsbergPhilippe MervielMarc BardouFranck PerrotinThomas SchmitzOlivier PiconeJeanne SibiudeKarine CheminDominique DallayFrédéric CoatlevenLoïc SentilhesCéline BrochotAstrid Eckman-LacroixElise ThellierFrédérique FalchierPhilippe DeruelleMuriel DoretXavier Carcopino-TusoliNicolas Meunier-BeillardHervé FernandezVincent VillefranqueCaroline DiguistoDamien SubtilClémence HoussinPhilippe GillardLaurent MandelbrotAurelie Godard-MarceauNathalie LesavreClaude VirtosElodie DebrasAude BourtembourgClaire ToubinDanièle AddesVéronique UguenCleo TourbotCaroline LelievreChristophe TremouilhacAnne-Hélène SaliouAurelie DerrieuStephanie AugetAnne LegourrierecAnne LerouxJulie Fort-JacquierMarion SercleratNathalie LaurenceauAudrey RenouleauEliane CatteauJulie BlancCandice RoninLaurence PiechonSéverine PuppoFanny GrecoSandrine PettazzoniMuriel AthlaniAmina DesvignesAnnie PetiteauAmina El YaakoubiValérie BechadergueValérie VaugirardMarie-Emmanuelle NeveuCaroline GeylMarie-Victoire SenatClaire ColmantMarie HoullierMyriam VirlouetMarion MirYasmina BejaouiHélène Le CornuLauriane NikelElodie GustaveAmandine StadlerAhmad MehdiTiphaine BarjatSuzanne LimaThomas CorsiniAnne GenodCharlotte VermeschCécile FangetMarianne PerrotManuela MunozSylvie PitavalFanny MagandFrançoise BaldiStephanie BretAnne-Lise VerdierChristelle DenisCarine ArlicotJérôme PotinStéphanie ChretienJulie PaternotteNathalie TrignolÉlisabeth BlinCamille MathieuAnne DubreuilAnne Viallon PelletierCatherine GuerinChloé ArthuisChristophe VayssieresOlivier ParantMarion GroussollesMaria DenisM Mathieu MorinMarie-Thérèse BavouxJuliette PellouxAnne-Claire JambonMadeleine SantraineVeronique LebuffePascale BrouxThierry DzukouMagloire GnansounouDidier HubertClaire DjazetLudivine DestoopMarine DeruePierrick TheretDominique DelzenneStéphanie DaussinAlice FraissinetMélanie VannerumCyril FaraguetLaurence LandaisMariana RaduAnne RougetSena Al SudaniBernard GuillonEstelle WucherVéronique SelvaSandrine RevironFrancis SchwetterléCécile ChassandeVéronique GrandinEliane KrtolizaPatrick BecherMarie SarrauClaire LecoqElsa LutringerDenis RouxNoémie BergeClémentine BarbierAnne HeronAudrey Farina-BracquartMarie-Paule CurtetEvelyne LefebureMarie-Hélène Le DouarinHassan Al RayesÉmilie MagneNathalie DestampesÉmilie RicardPascale GhezziCatherine GuillenFanny AlazardMarie-Thé CampanaroFlorence MojardMagalie David-ReynardPatricia FumaRemy De MontgolfierCapucine NeelGuillaume LegendreIsabelle AndreSylvie NordstromBrigitte GuionnetCatherine Crenn HebertChloé DussauxKarine AchaintreAnne WagnerMartine WerveakeEloïse De GouvilleGeorge TheresinMarie Pierre CouetouxLydia CaillaudMarie-Pierre FernandezSabrina BottetM Alain AlmodovarElisa EtienneVéronique GuiterasAngélique TorresN. RocheMyriam NassefChristine Abel-FaureMarie LouvetCarole EttoriGuillaume DucarmeValérie Bonnenfant-MezerayLaurence Szezot-RenaudeauMarie-Pierre BerteElodie Netier-HeraultStéphanie Manson-GalloneFranck MauvielNathalie AgostiniMarine MazeaudJean-Claude DaussetIsabelle De MurciaEmilie AlliotAnne-Marie BesMagali Biferi MagaliHélène HeckenrothSophie MorangeGersende ChiuotAudrey GnisciAnnie AllegreLaetitia LecqEva BalenboisClaire TouretteAude FigarellaDio AndriamanjayPauline VignolesCatherine CazellesVéronique Lejeune SaadaBenafsheh KashaniIsabelle ChevalierMuriel TerrieresAudrey CointementValérie BenhaïmNajat LindouneAnne-Sophie MaisonneuveM Frédéric DaubercyGuilia MencattiniVanessa CombaudIsabelle MoyaXavier-Côme DonatoRaoul DesbriereMarie LafonVéronique Baudet
Source
BMJ Open, Vol 13, Iss 3 (2023)
Subject
Medicine
Language
English
ISSN
2044-6055
Abstract
Objectives Women of low socioeconomic status have been described as having suboptimal prenatal care, which in turn has been associated with poor pregnancy outcomes. Many types of conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes have been developed, including programmes to improve prenatal care or smoking cessation during pregnancy, and their effects demonstrated. However, ethical critiques have included paternalism and lack of informed choice. Our objective was to determine if women and healthcare professionals (HPs) shared these concerns.Design Prospective qualitative research.Setting We included economically disadvantaged women, as defined by health insurance data, who participated in the French NAITRE randomised trial assessing a CCT programme during prenatal follow-up to improve pregnancy outcomes. The HP worked in some maternities participating in this trial.Participants 26 women, 14 who received CCT and 12 who did not, mostly unemployed (20/26), and - 7 HPs.Interventions We conducted a multicentre cross-sectional qualitative study among women and HPs who participated in the NAITRE Study to assess their views on CCT. The women were interviewed after childbirth.Results Women did not perceive CCT negatively. They did not mention feeling stigmatised. They described CCT as a significant source of aid for women with limited financial resources. HP described the CCT in less positive terms, for example, expressing concern about discussing cash transfer at their first medical consultation with women. Though they emphasised ethical concerns about the basis of the trial, they recognised the importance of evaluating CCT.Conclusions In France, a high-income country where prenatal follow-up is free, HPs were concerned that the CCT programme would change their relationship with patients and wondered if it was the best use of funding. However, women who received a cash incentive said they did not feel stigmatised and indicated that these payments helped them prepare for their baby’s birth.Trial registration number NCT02402855