부산대학교 도서관

Introduction Advances in stroke care have led to more patients eligible for thrombectomy. With these advances, it has become imperative to create a seamless workflow for thrombectomy candidates to ensure rapid door‐to‐puncture times and, ultimately, improve patient outcomes. We sought to determine what barriers are causing delays in patients’ door‐to‐puncture time. Methods A survey was distributed to all members of the Neurology PGY2, PGY3, PGY4 classes and vascular fellows at our single‐center, Comprehensive Stroke Center. The survey allowed participants to freely respond to questions regarding obstacles they encountered that led to delays in door‐to‐puncture times. All survey responses were anonymized. Results The survey was sent to 32 participants, with 26 responses. Of the 26 responses, 11 respondents (42%) noted that obtaining IV access for CTA/CTP scans was a significant cause of delay. Other responses included lack of availability of family for collateral (23%), CT scanner availability (15%), and length of time to decide if the patient is a thrombectomy candidate (15%). Conclusion The goal of this study was to collect data from the individuals involved in the direct care of acute stroke patients who are thrombectomy candidates. We used their experience to determine which points in the stroke alert workflow led to delays in door‐to‐puncture time. Our survey showed the most consistent delay is obtaining proper IV access for CTA and CTP imaging. This information was valuable and has led to the creation of a coalition between the neurology and emergency medicine departments, nursing, and CT technologists to create a “CODE IV” protocol to be implemented into the stroke alert workflow. We aim to report the change in door‐to‐puncture time after the implementation of this new protocol.