학술논문
A formative cross-sectional study to assess caregiver’s health-seeking behaviour and knowledge surrounding malaria, and understand the burden of malaria among children under-five in conflict-affected communities of Cameroon
Document Type
article
Author
Elvis Asangbeng Tanue; Lundi-Anne Omam; Glennis T. Ayuk; Bibiche Modjenpa Noukeme; Alain Metuge; Isabelle Nganmou; Margaret Besem Ebob; Laura Donovan; Ann-Sophie Stratil; Helen Counihan; Claude Ngwayu Nkfusai; Helen Hawkings; Blanka Homolova; Elizabeth Berryman; Maxwell Kolawole; Yakouba Zoungrana; Dorothy Achu; Samuel Wanji; Esther Njomo Omam
Source
Malaria Journal, Vol 23, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2024)
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
1475-2875
Abstract
Abstract Background Malaria remains a major global health problem often worsened by political instability and armed conflict. The purpose of the study was to explore community knowledge, attitudes and practices on malaria prevention, and to understand the burden of malaria and health-seeking behaviours of caregivers of children under-five in conflict-affected communities of the South West and Littoral Regions of Cameroon. Methods A cross-sectional survey involving internally displaced persons (IDPS), host population, and their children under-five was conducted across 80 communities. The survey was conducted from May to June 2021. Participants were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. Malaria prevalence for children under-five was determined using rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) on blood samples. Association between variables and displacement status was measured using chi square test and multivariate logistic regression model was fitted to identify factors associated with adequate knowledge on malaria prevention. Results A total of 2386 adults participated in the study and 1543 RDTs were conducted for children under-five. Adequate levels of knowledge and attitudes on malaria prevention was recorded among 1258 (52.9%) of the participants, with very strong evidence to suggest the level to be higher among the host (59.5%) compared to the IDPs (49.5%) and returnees (39.7%) (p