학술논문
Variability in objective and subjective measures affects baseline values in studies of patients with COPD.
Document Type
article
Author
Wayne H Anderson; Jae Wook Ha; David J Couper; Wanda K O'Neal; R Graham Barr; Eugene R Bleecker; Elizabeth E Carretta; Christopher B Cooper; Claire M Doerschuk; M Bradley Drummond; MeiLan K Han; Nadia N Hansel; Victor Kim; Eric C Kleerup; Fernando J Martinez; Stephen I Rennard; Donald Tashkin; Prescott G Woodruff; Robert Paine; Jeffrey L Curtis; Richard E Kanner; SPIROMICS Research Group
Source
PLoS ONE, Vol 12, Iss 9, p e0184606 (2017)
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
1932-6203
Abstract
Understanding the reliability and repeatability of clinical measurements used in the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of disease progression is of critical importance across all disciplines of clinical practice and in clinical trials to assess therapeutic efficacy and safety.Our goal is to understand normal variability for assessing true changes in health status and to more accurately utilize this data to differentiate disease characteristics and outcomes.Our study is the first study designed entirely to establish the repeatability of a large number of instruments utilized for the clinical assessment of COPD in the same subjects over the same period. We utilized SPIROMICS participants (n = 98) that returned to their clinical center within 6 weeks of their baseline visit to repeat complete baseline assessments. Demographics, spirometry, questionnaires, complete blood cell counts (CBC), medical history, and emphysema status by computerized tomography (CT) imaging were obtained.Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were highly repeatable (ICC's >0.9) but the 6 minute walk (6MW) was less so (ICC = 0.79). Among questionnaires, the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) was most repeatable. Self-reported clinical features, such as exacerbation history, and features of chronic bronchitis, often produced kappa values