학술논문

Duplication within two regions distal to MECP2: clinical similarity with MECP2 duplication syndrome
Document Type
article
Source
BMC Medical Genomics, Vol 16, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2023)
Subject
Gene dysfunction
MECP2 duplication syndrome
Progressive neurological disorder
X-linked intellectual disabilities
Xq28 duplication
Chromosomal microarray
Internal medicine
RC31-1245
Genetics
QH426-470
Language
English
ISSN
1755-8794
Abstract
Abstract Background X-linked methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MECP2) duplication syndrome is prevalent in approximately 1% of X-linked intellectual disabilities. Accumulating evidence has suggested that MECP2 is the causative gene of MECP2 duplication syndrome. We report a case of a 17-year-old boy with a 1.2 Mb duplication distal to MECP2 on chromosome Xq28. Although this region does not contain MECP2, the clinical features and course of the boy are remarkably similar to those observed in MECP2 duplication syndrome. Recently, case reports have described duplication in the region distal to, and not containing, MECP2. These regions have been classified as the K/L-mediated Xq28 duplication region and int22h1/int22h2-mediated Xq28 duplication region. The case reports also described signs similar to those of MECP2 duplication syndrome. To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first case to include these two regions. Case presentation The boy presented with a mild to moderate regressive intellectual disability and progressive neurological disorder. He developed epilepsy at the age of 6 years and underwent a bilateral equinus foot surgery at 14 years of age because of the increasing spasticity in lower extremities since the age of 11. Intracranial findings showed hypoplasia of the corpus callosum, cerebellum, and brain stem; linear hyperintensity in the deep white matter; and decreased white matter capacity. During his childhood, he suffered from recurrent infection. However, genital problems, skin abnormalities and gastrointestinal manifestations (gastroesophageal reflux) were not observed. Conclusions Cases in which duplication was observed in the region of Xq28 that does not include MECP2 also showed symptoms similar to those of MECP2 duplication syndrome. We compared four pathologies: MECP2 duplication syndrome with minimal regions, duplication within the two distal regions without MECP2, and our case including both regions. Our results suggest that MECP2 alone may not explain all symptoms of duplication in the distal part of Xq28.