학술논문

The basophil activation test differentiates between patients with wheat‐dependent exercise‐induced anaphylaxis and control subjects using gluten and isolated gluten protein types
Document Type
article
Source
Clinical and Translational Allergy, Vol 11, Iss 6, Pp n/a-n/a (2021)
Subject
ω5‐gliadin
basophil activation test
gluten
wheat allergy
wheat‐dependent exercise‐induced anaphylaxis (WDEIA)
Immunologic diseases. Allergy
RC581-607
Language
English
ISSN
2045-7022
Abstract
Abstract Background Oral food challenge using gluten and cofactors is the gold standard to diagnose wheat‐dependent exercise‐induced anaphylaxis (WDEIA), but this procedure puts patients at risk of an anaphylactic reaction. Specific IgE to ω5‐gliadins as major allergens and skin prick tests to wheat may yield negative results. Thus, we designed a proof‐of‐principle study to investigate the utility of the basophil activation test (BAT) for WDEIA diagnosis. Methods Different gluten protein types (GPT; α‐, γ‐, ω1,2‐ and ω5‐gliadins, high‐molecular‐weight glutenin subunits [HMW‐GS] and low‐molecular‐weight glutenin subunits [LMW‐GS]) and gluten were used in different concentrations to measure basophil activation in 12 challenge‐confirmed WDEIA patients and 10 control subjects. The results were compared to routine allergy diagnostics. Parameters analyzed include the percentage of CD63+ basophils, the ratio of %CD63+ basophils induced by GPT/gluten to %CD63+ basophils induced by anti‐FcεRI antibody, area under the dose‐response curve and test sensitivity and specificity. Results GPT and gluten induced strong basophil activation for %CD63+ basophils and for %CD63+/anti‐FcɛRI ratio in a dose‐dependent manner in patients, but not in controls (p