학술논문

A Person-Centered Interdisciplinary Plan-of-Care Program for Dialysis: Implementation and Preliminary TestingPLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY
Document Type
article
Source
Kidney Medicine, Vol 3, Iss 2, Pp 193-205.e1 (2021)
Subject
Dialysis
hemodialysis
person-centered care
interdisciplinary plan of care
implementation
Diseases of the genitourinary system. Urology
RC870-923
Language
English
ISSN
2590-0595
Abstract
Rationale & Objective: Despite growing interest in individualizing care, routine dialysis processes, including the interdisciplinary plan of care, often fail to account for patient-identified priorities. To better align dialysis care with patient priorities and improve care planning experiences, we implemented a person-centered care plan program at a single clinic. We also sought to gain insight into key implementation considerations and areas for program improvement. Study Design: 6-month quality improvement project with research substudy. Setting & Participants: 49 hemodialysis patients and 14 care team members at a North Carolina dialysis clinic. Quality Improvement Activities: Implementation of My Dialysis Plan, a person-centered care plan program. Outcome(s): Participant perspectives and care plan meeting characteristics (quality improvement); pre- to postprogram change in patient-reported autonomy support, patient-centeredness of care, and dialysis care individualization (research). Analytical Approach: We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to guide implementation and evaluation. We conducted pre-, intra-, and post-project interviews with clinic stakeholders (patients, clinic personnel, and medical providers) to identify implementation barriers, facilitators, and perceptions. We compared pre- and post-project care plan meeting content and patient-reported outcome survey scores. Results: We conducted 54 care plans with 49 patients. Overall, care teams successfully used My Dialysis Plan to elicit and link patient priorities to actionable aspects of dialysis care. Participants identified interdisciplinary team commitment, accountability, and the structured yet flexible meeting approach as key implementation elements. Throughout the project, stakeholder input guided program modifications (eg, implementation practices and resources) to better meet clinic needs, but follow-up on care plan–identified action items remained challenging. Among the 28 substudy participants, there was no difference in pre- to post-project patient-reported outcome survey scores. Limitations: Single clinic implementation. Conclusions: My Dialysis Plan has the potential to enhance dialysis care individualization and care plan experiences. Evaluation of program impact on patient-reported and clinical outcomes is needed.