학술논문
External quality assessment providers’ services appear to more impact the immunohaematology performance of laboratories than national regulatory and economic conditions
Document Type
research-article
Author
Buchta, Christoph; Coucke, Wim; Huf, Wolfgang; Griesmacher, Andrea; Müller, Mathias M.; Mayr, Wolfgang R.; Flesland, Øystein; Politis, Constantina; Wiersum-Osselton, Johanna; Aburto, Andrés; Badrick, Tony; Bouacida, Lobna; Budina, Marek; Duenas, Joseph A.; Geilenkeuser, Wolf-Jochen; Guimarães, André V.P.; Hecimovic, Ana; Jutzi, Markus; Lee, Chang-Keun; Lim, Young Ae; Mammen, Joy; Molnár, Petra Magdolna; Mokhtari, Azita; Morabito, Giuseppa; Muñiz-Diaz, Eduardo; Niekerk, Truscha; Pakkanen, Anja; Pezzati, Paola; Popa, Razvan; Sárkány, Erika; Siest, Jean-Pascal; Suvagandha, Dhitiwass; Thelen, Marc; Ullhagen, Jenny; Vitkus, Dalius; Körmöczi, Günther F.
Source
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). 60(3):361-369
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
1434-6621
1437-4331
1437-4331
Abstract
Objectives Medical laboratories may, at their own discretion, exceed but not undercut regulatory quality requirements. Available economic resources, however, may drive or hinder eagerness to exceed minimum requirements. Depending on the respective scopes of regulatory and economic framework conditions, differing levels of quality efforts to safeguard laboratory performance can be anticipated. However, this has not yet been investigated. Methods Immunohaematology external quality assessment (EQA) results collected by 26 EQA providers from their participant laboratories in 73 countries from 2004 to 2019 were evaluated. Error rates were aggregated in groups according to the respective national regulatory and economic framework conditions, to whether or not expert advice was provided in case of incorrect results, and the frequency of EQA samples. Results These representative data indicate no association between national regulatory (mandatory participation in EQA, monitoring of performance of individual laboratories by authorities, financial consequences of incorrect results) and economic (level of national income, share of national health expenditure) conditions to the quality performance of medical laboratories in immunohaematology. However, EQA providers’ support for laboratories in the event of incorrect results appear to be associated with lower error rates, but a high EQA sample frequency with higher error rates. Conclusions Further research into the impact of introducing or changing services of EQA providers is needed to confirm the results found in this first of its kind study.