학술논문
人工鼻和呼吸湿化治疗仪（AIRVO）对人工气道患者临床疗效对比 / Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Artificial Nasal and Respiratory Humidiifcation (AIRVO) in Patients With Artiifcial Airway
Document Type
Academic Journal
Source
中国继续医学教育. 8(35):120-122
Subject
Language
Chinese
ISSN
1674-9308
Abstract
目的：对比分析人工鼻和呼吸湿化治疗仪（AIRVO）应用于重症监护室人工气道患者临床效果。方法选择我院ICU收治的不同类型人工气道患者113例，其中52例使用人工鼻（对照组）行气道湿化，另外61例使用AIRVO（观察组）行气道湿化，对比分析两组患者临床疗效。结果观察组患者呛咳发生率、痰液黏稠度因湿化改变程度、呼吸机相关性肺炎（VAP）发生率较对照组改善，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。观察组平均每住院日气道湿化单项费用低于对照组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.01）。结论人工鼻和AIRVO应用于重症监护室不同气道类型患者均能达到较好的气道湿化效果，但相比较AIRVO气道湿化效果更为显著，可根据临床时机选择使用或者交替使用，临床效果更佳。
Objective To analyze and compare the clinical effect of artiifcial nasal respiratory humidiifcation (AIRVO) in patients with artiifcial airway in intensive care unit. Methods 113 different types of artificial airway patients in our hospital were treated in ICU cases, 52 cases of artificial nose (control group) for airway humidification, 61 cases using AIRVO respiratory humidiifcation treatment (observation group) for airway humidiifcation, comparative analysis of two groups of patients with clinical curative effect. Results Patients in the observation group the incidence of cough, sputum viscosity due to wet change, degree of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) incidence rate compared with the control group, the difference was statistically signiifcant (P<0.05). In the observation group, the average daily airway humidiifcation was lower than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). Conclusion Artiifcial nose and breathe AIRVO of wetting therapeutic apparatus used in the intensive care unit patients with different types of airway can achieve good effect of airway moist, but compare AIRVO breathing to moist therapy apparatus airway moist effect is more signiifcant, can be used according to the clinical use timing or alternate, clinical effect is better.
Objective To analyze and compare the clinical effect of artiifcial nasal respiratory humidiifcation (AIRVO) in patients with artiifcial airway in intensive care unit. Methods 113 different types of artificial airway patients in our hospital were treated in ICU cases, 52 cases of artificial nose (control group) for airway humidification, 61 cases using AIRVO respiratory humidiifcation treatment (observation group) for airway humidiifcation, comparative analysis of two groups of patients with clinical curative effect. Results Patients in the observation group the incidence of cough, sputum viscosity due to wet change, degree of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) incidence rate compared with the control group, the difference was statistically signiifcant (P<0.05). In the observation group, the average daily airway humidiifcation was lower than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). Conclusion Artiifcial nose and breathe AIRVO of wetting therapeutic apparatus used in the intensive care unit patients with different types of airway can achieve good effect of airway moist, but compare AIRVO breathing to moist therapy apparatus airway moist effect is more signiifcant, can be used according to the clinical use timing or alternate, clinical effect is better.