학술논문
关节置换与闭合复位内固定治疗合并骨质疏松不稳定型转子间骨折的对比 / Efficacy of joint replacement versus closed reduction and internal fixation in treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures combined with osteoporosis
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
朱睿智; 曲强; 崔鹏飞; 刘栋; 张永涛; 王昌耀; Zhu Ruizhi; Qu Qiang; Cui Pengfei; Liu Dong; Zhang Yongtao; Wang Changyao
Source
中国组织工程研究 / Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research. 28(12):1869-1874
Subject
Language
Chinese
ISSN
2095-4344
Abstract
背景:稳定型转子间骨折可以通过闭合复位内固定得到很好的修复效果,但对于合并骨质疏松的不稳定型转子间骨折,目前没有具有绝对优势的手术方式. 目的:通过对比闭合复位内固定与关节置换的相关指标,探究关节置换治疗合并骨质疏松老年不稳定型转子间骨折的疗效. 方法:回顾性分析2017年1月至2020年1月在青岛大学附属医院接受治疗的102例老年不稳定型股骨转子间骨折患者的临床资料.根据手术方式将患者分为2组,Gamma3组62例,采用Gamma3内固定系统治疗;关节置换组40例,采用人工股骨头置换或全髋关节置换治疗.对两组患者的手术信息、住院情况、髋关节功能以及术后并发症等方面进行比较. 结果与结论:①Gamma3组和关节置换组在负重时间(P＜0.001)、住院时间(P＜0.05)、术中出血量(P＜0.001),手术时长(P＜0.001)方面相比差异有显著性意义,关节置换组平均负重时间和住院时间均比闭合复位内固定的Gamma3组短;Gamma3组术中出血量和手术时长均优于关节置换组;②两组患者在术后12个月髋关节Harris评分、分项百分制髋评分以及术后并发症方面相比差异均无显著性意义(P=0.526,0.788,0.228);③提示关节置换在治疗合并骨质疏松的老年不稳定型转子间骨折中取得了较好的疗效,能使患者实现早期负重和功能锻炼;谨慎选择适合的患者和假体类型进行关节置换会使患者获得更大的收益.
BACKGROUND:Stable intertrochanteric fractures can be treated by closed reduction and internal fixation,but there is no absolute advantage for unstable intertrochanteric fractures with osteoporosis. OBJECTIVE:To investigate the efficacy of arthroplasty in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly with osteoporosis by comparing the indexes related to closed reduction internal fixation and arthroplasty. METHODS:Clinical data of 102 elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the femur treated in Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from January 2017 to January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical method.In the Gamma3 group,62 cases received Gamma3 internal fixation system.In the joint replacement group,40 cases received an artificial femoral head replacement or total hip replacement.Surgical information,hospitalization,hip function,and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)There were statistical differences between the Gamma3 group and the joint replacement group in weight-bearing time(P＜0.001),hospital stay(P＜0.05),intraoperative bleeding(P＜0.001),and length of surgery(P＜0.001).The mean weight-bearing time and hospital stay were shorter in the joint replacement group than in the Gamma3 group.Intraoperative bleeding and duration of surgery were better in the Gamma3 group than in the joint replacement group.(2)There was no significant difference in Harris hip score,subitem centesimal hip score,and postoperative complications 12 months after surgery in both groups(P=0.526,0.788,0.228).(3)It is indicated that arthroplasty has achieved better outcomes in the treatment of elderly unstable intertrochanteric fractures combined with osteoporosis,enabling early weight bearing and functional exercise.Careful selection of the appropriate patient and prosthesis type for arthroplasty will result in greater patient benefit.
BACKGROUND:Stable intertrochanteric fractures can be treated by closed reduction and internal fixation,but there is no absolute advantage for unstable intertrochanteric fractures with osteoporosis. OBJECTIVE:To investigate the efficacy of arthroplasty in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly with osteoporosis by comparing the indexes related to closed reduction internal fixation and arthroplasty. METHODS:Clinical data of 102 elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the femur treated in Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from January 2017 to January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical method.In the Gamma3 group,62 cases received Gamma3 internal fixation system.In the joint replacement group,40 cases received an artificial femoral head replacement or total hip replacement.Surgical information,hospitalization,hip function,and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:(1)There were statistical differences between the Gamma3 group and the joint replacement group in weight-bearing time(P＜0.001),hospital stay(P＜0.05),intraoperative bleeding(P＜0.001),and length of surgery(P＜0.001).The mean weight-bearing time and hospital stay were shorter in the joint replacement group than in the Gamma3 group.Intraoperative bleeding and duration of surgery were better in the Gamma3 group than in the joint replacement group.(2)There was no significant difference in Harris hip score,subitem centesimal hip score,and postoperative complications 12 months after surgery in both groups(P=0.526,0.788,0.228).(3)It is indicated that arthroplasty has achieved better outcomes in the treatment of elderly unstable intertrochanteric fractures combined with osteoporosis,enabling early weight bearing and functional exercise.Careful selection of the appropriate patient and prosthesis type for arthroplasty will result in greater patient benefit.