학술논문
Phase transition in Random Circuit Sampling
Document Type
Working Paper
Author
Morvan, A.; Villalonga, B.; Mi, X.; Mandrà, S.; Bengtsson, A.; Klimov, P. V.; Chen, Z.; Hong, S.; Erickson, C.; Drozdov, I. K.; Chau, J.; Laun, G.; Movassagh, R.; Asfaw, A.; Brandão, L. T. A. N.; Peralta, R.; Abanin, D.; Acharya, R.; Allen, R.; Andersen, T. I.; Anderson, K.; Ansmann, M.; Arute, F.; Arya, K.; Atalaya, J.; Bardin, J. C.; Bilmes, A.; Bortoli, G.; Bourassa, A.; Bovaird, J.; Brill, L.; Broughton, M.; Buckley, B. B.; Buell, D. A.; Burger, T.; Burkett, B.; Bushnell, N.; Campero, J.; Chang, H. S.; Chiaro, B.; Chik, D.; Chou, C.; Cogan, J.; Collins, R.; Conner, P.; Courtney, W.; Crook, A. L.; Curtin, B.; Debroy, D. M.; Barba, A. Del Toro; Demura, S.; Di Paolo, A.; Dunsworth, A.; Faoro, L.; Farhi, E.; Fatemi, R.; Ferreira, V. S.; Burgos, L. Flores; Forati, E.; Fowler, A. G.; Foxen, B.; Garcia, G.; Genois, E.; Giang, W.; Gidney, C.; Gilboa, D.; Giustina, M.; Gosula, R.; Dau, A. Grajales; Gross, J. A.; Habegger, S.; Hamilton, M. C.; Hansen, M.; Harrigan, M. P.; Harrington, S. D.; Heu, P.; Hoffmann, M. R.; Huang, T.; Huff, A.; Huggins, W. J.; Ioffe, L. B.; Isakov, S. V.; Iveland, J.; Jeffrey, E.; Jiang, Z.; Jones, C.; Juhas, P.; Kafri, D.; Khattar, T.; Khezri, M.; Kieferová, M.; Kim, S.; Kitaev, A.; Klots, A. R.; Korotkov, A. N.; Kostritsa, F.; Kreikebaum, J. M.; Landhuis, D.; Laptev, P.; Lau, K. -M.; Laws, L.; Lee, J.; Lee, K. W.; Lensky, Y. D.; Lester, B. J.; Lill, A. T.; Liu, W.; Livingston, W. P.; Locharla, A.; Malone, F. D.; Martin, O.; Martin, S.; McClean, J. R.; McEwen, M.; Miao, K. C.; Mieszala, A.; Montazeri, S.; Mruczkiewicz, W.; Naaman, O.; Neeley, M.; Neill, C.; Nersisyan, A.; Newman, M.; Ng, J. H.; Nguyen, A.; Nguyen, M.; Niu, M. Yuezhen; O'Brien, T. E.; Omonije, S.; Opremcak, A.; Petukhov, A.; Potter, R.; Pryadko, L. P.; Quintana, C.; Rhodes, D. M.; Rosenberg, E.; Rocque, C.; Roushan, P.; Rubin, N. C.; Saei, N.; Sank, D.; Sankaragomathi, K.; Satzinger, K. J.; Schurkus, H. F.; Schuster, C.; Shearn, M. J.; Shorter, A.; Shutty, N.; Shvarts, V.; Sivak, V.; Skruzny, J.; Smith, W. C.; Somma, R. D.; Sterling, G.; Strain, D.; Szalay, M.; Thor, D.; Torres, A.; Vidal, G.; Heidweiller, C. Vollgraff; White, T.; Woo, B. W. K.; Xing, C.; Yao, Z. J.; Yeh, P.; Yoo, J.; Young, G.; Zalcman, A.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, N.; Zobrist, N.; Rieffel, E. G.; Biswas, R.; Babbush, R.; Bacon, D.; Hilton, J.; Lucero, E.; Neven, H.; Megrant, A.; Kelly, J.; Aleiner, I.; Smelyanskiy, V.; Kechedzhi, K.; Chen, Y.; Boixo, S.
Source
Subject
Language
Abstract
Undesired coupling to the surrounding environment destroys long-range correlations on quantum processors and hinders the coherent evolution in the nominally available computational space. This incoherent noise is an outstanding challenge to fully leverage the computation power of near-term quantum processors. It has been shown that benchmarking Random Circuit Sampling (RCS) with Cross-Entropy Benchmarking (XEB) can provide a reliable estimate of the effective size of the Hilbert space coherently available. The extent to which the presence of noise can trivialize the outputs of a given quantum algorithm, i.e. making it spoofable by a classical computation, is an unanswered question. Here, by implementing an RCS algorithm we demonstrate experimentally that there are two phase transitions observable with XEB, which we explain theoretically with a statistical model. The first is a dynamical transition as a function of the number of cycles and is the continuation of the anti-concentration point in the noiseless case. The second is a quantum phase transition controlled by the error per cycle; to identify it analytically and experimentally, we create a weak link model which allows varying the strength of noise versus coherent evolution. Furthermore, by presenting an RCS experiment with 67 qubits at 32 cycles, we demonstrate that the computational cost of our experiment is beyond the capabilities of existing classical supercomputers, even when accounting for the inevitable presence of noise. Our experimental and theoretical work establishes the existence of transitions to a stable computationally complex phase that is reachable with current quantum processors.