학술논문
SDR, EVC, and SDREVC: Limitations and Extensions
Document Type
Working Paper
Author
Hunter, E. D.; Amsler, C.; Breuker, H.; Bumbar, M.; Chesnevskaya, S.; Costantini, G.; Ferragut, R.; Giammarchi, M.; Gligorova, A.; Gosta, G.; Higaki, H.; Killian, C.; Kraxberger, V.; Kuroda, N.; Lanz, A.; Leali, M.; Maero, G.; Malbrunot, C.; Mascagna, V.; Matsuda, Y.; Mäckel, V.; Migliorati, S.; Murtagh, D. J.; Nanda, A.; Nowak, L.; Gustafsson, F. Parnefjord; Rheinfrank, S.; Romé, M.; Simon, M. C.; Tajima, M.; Toso, V.; Ulmer, S.; Venturelli, L.; Weiser, A.; Widmann, E.; Yamazaki, Y.; Zmeskal, J.
Source
Subject
Language
Abstract
Methods for reducing the radius, temperature, and space charge of nonneutral plasma are usually reported for conditions which approximate an ideal Penning Malmberg trap. Here we show that (1) similar methods are still effective under surprisingly adverse circumstances: we perform SDR and SDREVC in a strong magnetic mirror field using only 3 out of 4 rotating wall petals. In addition, we demonstrate (2) an alternative to SDREVC, using e-kick instead of EVC and (3) an upper limit for how much plasma can be cooled to T < 20 K using EVC. This limit depends on the space charge, not on the number of particles or the plasma density.
Comment: Version 2: a small discrepancy between the N values for Table 1 and Fig. 3 led to an investigation of the charge counting diagnostic. There is a small energy dependence which only became apparent following improvements to pre-SDREVC. The pulsed dump was modified to reduce this dependence. The data for Table 1 and Fig. 3 was taken again with the improved methods
Comment: Version 2: a small discrepancy between the N values for Table 1 and Fig. 3 led to an investigation of the charge counting diagnostic. There is a small energy dependence which only became apparent following improvements to pre-SDREVC. The pulsed dump was modified to reduce this dependence. The data for Table 1 and Fig. 3 was taken again with the improved methods