부산대학교 도서관

A constant stellar-mass to light ratio $M_{\star}/L$ has been widely-used in studies of galaxy dynamics and strong lensing, which aim at disentangling the mass density distributions of dark matter and baryons. In this work, we take early-type galaxies from the cosmological hydrodynamic IllustrisTNG-100 simulation to investigate possible systematic bias in the inferences due to a constant $M_{\star}/L$ assumption. To do so, we construct two-component matter density models, where one component describes the dark matter distribution, the other one for the stellar mass, which is made to follow the light profile by assuming a constant factor of $M_{\star}/L$. Specifically, we adopt multiple commonly used dark matter models and light distributions. We fit the two-component models directly to the {\it total} matter density distributions of simulated galaxies to eliminate systematics from other modelling procedures. We find that galaxies in general have more centrally-concentrated stellar mass profile than their light distribution. This is more significant among more massive galaxies, for which the $M_{\star}/L$ profile rises up markedly towards the centre and may often exhibit a dented feature due to on-going star formation at about one effective radius, encompassing a quenched bulge region. As a consequence, a constant $M_{\star}/L$ causes a model degeneracy to be artificially broken under specific model assumptions, resulting in strong and model-dependent biases on estimated properties, such as the central dark matter fraction and the initial mass function. Either a steeper dark matter profile with an over-predicted density fraction, or an over-predicted stellar mass normalization ($M_{\star}/L$) is often obtained through model fitting. The exact biased behaviour depends on the slope difference between mass and light, as well as on the adopted models for dark matter and light.
Comment: 20 pages, 13 figures