학술논문

Sensitivity of Anomalous Quartic Gauge Couplings via $Z\gamma\gamma$ Production at Future hadron-hadron Colliders
Document Type
Working Paper
Source
Nucl.Phys.B 980 (2022) 115851
Subject
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
High Energy Physics - Experiment
Language
Abstract
Triple gauge boson production provides a promising opportunity to probe the anomalous quartic gauge couplings in understanding the details of electroweak symmetry breaking at future hadron-hadron collider facilities with increasing center of mass energy and luminosity. In this paper, we investigate the sensitivities of dimension-8 anomalous couplings related to the $ZZ\gamma\gamma$ and $Z\gamma\gamma\gamma$ quartic vertices, defined in the effective field theory framework, via $pp\to Z\gamma\gamma$ signal process with Z-boson decaying to charged leptons at the high luminosity phase of LHC (HL-LHC) and future facilities, namely the High Energy LHC (HE-LHC) and Future Circular hadron-hadron collider (FCC-hh). We analyzed the signal and relevant backgrounds via a cut based method with Monte Carlo event sampling where the detector responses of three hadron collider facilities, the center-of-mass energies of 14, 27 and 100 TeV with an integrated luminosities of 3, 15 and 30 ab$^{-1}$ are considered for the HL-LHC, HE-LHC and FCC-hh, respectively. The reconstructed 4-body invariant mass of $l^+l^-\gamma\gamma$ system is used to constrain the anomalous quartic gauge coupling parameters under the hypothesis of absence of anomalies in triple gauge couplings. Our results indicate that the sensitivity on anomalous quartic couplings $f_{T8}/\Lambda^{4}$ and $f_{T9}/\Lambda^{4}$ ($f_{T0}/\Lambda^{4}$, $f_{T1}/\Lambda^{4}$ and $f_{T2}/\Lambda^{4}$) at 95$\%$ C.L. for FCC-hh with $L_{int}$ = 30 ab$^{-1}$ without systematic errors are two (one) order better than the current experimental limits. Considering a realistic systematic uncertainty such as 10$\%$ from possible experimental sources, the sensitivity of all anomalous quartic couplings gets worsen by about 1.2$\%$, 1.7$\%$ and 1.5$\%$ compared to those without systematic uncertainty for HL-LHC, HE-LHC and FCC-hh, respectively.
Comment: 27 pages, 13 figures, 5 tables, version published in Nuclear Physics B