학술논문
Performance and Moli`ere radius measurements using a compact prototype of LumiCal in an electron test beam
Document Type
Working Paper
Author
Abramowicz, H.; Abusleme, A.; Afanaciev, K.; Benhammou, Y.; Borysov, O.; Borysova, M.; Jelisavcic, I. Bozovic; Daniluk, W.; Dannheim, D.; Demichev, M.; Elsener, K.; Firlej, M.; Firu, E.; Fiutowski, T.; Ghenescu, V.; Gostkin, M.; Hempelb, M.; Henschel, H.; Idzik, M.; Ignatenkoc, A.; Ishikawa, A.; Joffe, A.; Kacarevic, G.; Kananov, S.; Karachebanb, O.; Klempt, W.; Kotov, S.; Kotula, J.; Kruchonak, U.; Kulis, Sz.; Lange, W.; Leonard, J.; Lesiak, T.; Levy, A.; Levy, I.; Linssen, L.; Lohmann, W.; Moron, J.; Moszczynski, A.; Neagu, A. T.; Pawlik, B.; Preda, T.; Sailer, A.; Schumm, B.; Schuwalowd, S.; Sicking, 1E.; Swientek, K.; Turbiarz, B.; Vukasinovic, N.; Wojton, T.; Yamamoto, H.; Zawiejski, L.; Zgura, I. S.; Zhemchugov, A.
Source
Eur. Phys. J. C79 (2019) 579
Subject
Language
Abstract
A new design of a detector plane of sub-millimetre thickness for an electromagnetic sampling calorimeter is presented. It is intended to be used in the luminometers LumiCal and BeamCal in future linear $e^+e^-$ collider experiments. The detector planes were produced utilising novel connectivity scheme technologies. They were installed in a compact prototype of the calorimeter and tested at DESY with an electron beam of energy 1-5 GeV. The performance of a prototype of a compact LumiCal comprising eight detector planes was studied. The effective Moli`ere radius at 5 GeV was determined to be (8.1 +/- 0.1 (stat) +/- 0.3 (syst)) mm, a value well reproduced by the Monte Carlo (MC) simulation (8.4 +/- 0.1) mm. The dependence of the effective Moli`ere radius on the electron energy in the range 1-5 GeV was also studied. Good agreement was obtained between data and MC simulation.
Comment: 16 pages, 28 figures, Published in EPJC. Please note: Fig 16 in the published version us incorrect. The correct one appears in this replaced version
Comment: 16 pages, 28 figures, Published in EPJC. Please note: Fig 16 in the published version us incorrect. The correct one appears in this replaced version