학술논문

A new tool to derive simultaneously exponent and extremes of power-law distributions
Document Type
Working Paper
Source
MNRAS, 525, 4744 (2023)
Subject
Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena
Language
Abstract
Many experimental quantities show a power-law distribution $p(x)\propto x^{-\alpha}$. In astrophysics, examples are: size distribution of dust grains or luminosity function of galaxies. Such distributions are characterized by the exponent $\alpha$ and by the extremes $x_\text{min}$ $x_\text{max}$ where the distribution extends. There are no mathematical tools that derive the three unknowns at the same time. In general, one estimates a set of $\alpha$ corresponding to different guesses of $x_\text{min}$ $x_\text{max}$. Then, the best set of values describing the observed data is selected a posteriori. In this paper, we present a tool that finds contextually the three parameters based on simple assumptions on how the observed values $x_i$ populate the unknown range between $x_\text{min}$ and $x_\text{max}$ for a given $\alpha$. Our tool, freely downloadable, finds the best values through a non-linear least-squares fit. We compare our technique with the maximum likelihood estimators for power-law distributions, both truncated and not. Through simulated data, we show for each method the reliability of the computed parameters as a function of the number $N$ of data in the sample. We then apply our method to observed data to derive: i) the slope of the core mass function in the Perseus star-forming region, finding two power-law distributions: $\alpha=2.576$ between $1.06\,M_{\sun}$ and $3.35\,M_{\sun}$, $\alpha=3.39$ between $3.48\,M_{\sun}$ and $33.4\,M_{\sun}$; ii) the slope of the $\gamma$-ray spectrum of the blazar J0011.4+0057, extracted from the Fermi-LAT archive. For the latter case, we derive $\alpha=2.89$ between 1,484~MeV and 28.7~GeV; then we derive the time-resolved slopes using subsets 200 photons each.
Comment: Corrected few typos found at proof-reading stage. The only important modification is in Table 4 where "x_M not constrained" is now "x_M=40"