학술논문

窄化女性、隱形男性?性別化的國家生育統計 / Narrowing Women and Invisiblizing Men? Gendered Fertility Statistics in Taiwan
Document Type
Article
Source
女學學誌:婦女與性別研究 / Journal of Women's and Gender Studies. Issue 51, p53-107. 55 p.
Subject
生育統計
生殖分工
性別
問卷設計
延遲親職
生育想像
fertility statistics
division of procreative labor
gender
survey design
delayed parenthood
reproductive imaginary
Language
繁體中文
英文
ISSN
1683-4852
Abstract
This paper examines the gender politics surrounding national fertility statistics in Taiwan. We analyze three major fertility registries and surveys: the live birth registry based on birth certificates, the vital statistics based on household registration, and family and fertility surveys. Our aim is to explore how data collection, sampling, instrument design, interpretation and use of these fertility statistics conceptualize gender and reproduction. Our analysis reveals that the live birth data reporting centers on the statistics of newborns, and neglects to produce data centered on birthing women, such as age distribution and the cesarean rate per delivery. The household registry data only requires women to report the number of times they have given birth, leading to the calculation of the average age of first-time mothers without accounting for fathers. The Demographic Fact Book has included some male fertility statistics since 1972, but the government seldom utilizes them for population policy-making. The National Family and Fertility Survey, initiated in 1965, sampled women of reproductive age for more than 40 years and only began to include men in 2012. However, some of the survey questions asked men to evaluate the ideal biological age of women to give birth while neglecting to ask about men's age of first-time fatherhood and their experiences regarding their partners' miscarriage, pregnancy and birth. We conclude that Taiwan's national fertility statistics largely give a narrowed view of women, while making men invisible. We argue that the reproductive imaginary behind the making of statistics remains focused on the biological aspect of reproduction. Governmental data confines reproduction to the sexual division of procreative labor, implying women bear the sole responsibility. We propose that Taiwan should follow some international practices to incorporate both men's and women's reproductive beliefs and experiences covering biological, social, and cultural dimensions to better assess the changing fertility patterns and make more inclusive population policies.

Online Access