부산대학교 도서관

Background: We compared the clinical effectiveness of a new peritoneal dialysis (PD) product with polyvinyl chloride-containing tubing (Stay Safe Link®, SSL) with the plastic-free alternative (Stay Safe®, STS) in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD).Method: A multicentre, parallel, randomised, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial was conducted. Adult patients receiving CAPD were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to SSL or STS. The primary outcome was the rate of peritonitis after 1 year of follow-up.Results: A total of 472 subjects were randomised (SSL, n= 233; STS, n= 239). One subject in each group was excluded from the analysis as they withdrew consent before the first dialysis dose. Four hundred and seventy subjects (SSL, n= 232; STS, n= 238) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Non-inferiority between two groups was established as no significant difference was found in peritonitis rate (incident rate ratio: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.65–1.28). No significant difference was detected in weekly Kt/V (p= 0.58) and creatinine clearance (p= 0.55). However, the average ultrafiltration volume was significantly lower in SSL, with a mean difference of 93 ml (p< 0.01). SSL also demonstrated a 2.57-times higher risk of device defect than STS (95% CI: 1.77–3.75).Conclusion: SSL was non-inferior in peritonitis rate compared to plastic-free STS over 1 year in patients requiring CAPD. There was no difference in the delivered dialysis dose, but there was a higher rate of device defects with SSL.