학술논문
Postoperative emergence agitation and intraoperative sevoflurane sedation under caudal block in children: a randomized comparison of two sevoflurane doses.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Choi EK; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.; Park S; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.; Park KB; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dongsan Hospital, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.; Kwak KH; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.; Park S; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
Source
Publisher: Korean Society of Anesthesiologists Country of Publication: Korea (South) NLM ID: 101517708 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 1975-5171 (Print) Linking ISSN: 19755171 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Anesth Pain Med (Seoul) Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
1975-5171
Abstract
Background: Sub-umbilical surgery under caudal block in conjunction with sevoflurane sedation may be safe in terms of maintaining spontaneous breathing and avoiding complications associated with general anesthesia. However, sevoflurane-induced emergence agitation (EA) continues to be a clinically important phenomenon in children. To compare the incidence of EA in children undergoing sub-umbilical surgery under caudal block with two different doses of sevoflurane.
Methods: Forty children (aged 1-5 years) scheduled to undergo inguinal hernia repair under caudal block with sevoflurane sedation via a face mask were randomized into either the low-dose (1.0%) end-tidal sevoflurane concentration group (Group LS) or the high-dose (2.5%) end-tidal sevoflurane concentration group (Group HS). We monitored EA episodes at 5 and 30 min in the post-anesthetic care unit (PACU) by using the fourpoint agitation scale and the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale.
Results: The four-point agitation scale scores and PAED scores were not different between the groups at 5 min. However, the agitation score was higher in Group HS than in Group LS at 30 min after arriving in the PACU. The time required to recover from sedation was longer in Group HS than in Group LS.
Conclusions: Face-mask sedation with 1.0% sevoflurane in conjunction with caudal block may be more effective than that with 2.5% sevoflurane in preventing EA.
Competing Interests: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
(Copyright: © Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.)
Methods: Forty children (aged 1-5 years) scheduled to undergo inguinal hernia repair under caudal block with sevoflurane sedation via a face mask were randomized into either the low-dose (1.0%) end-tidal sevoflurane concentration group (Group LS) or the high-dose (2.5%) end-tidal sevoflurane concentration group (Group HS). We monitored EA episodes at 5 and 30 min in the post-anesthetic care unit (PACU) by using the fourpoint agitation scale and the Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale.
Results: The four-point agitation scale scores and PAED scores were not different between the groups at 5 min. However, the agitation score was higher in Group HS than in Group LS at 30 min after arriving in the PACU. The time required to recover from sedation was longer in Group HS than in Group LS.
Conclusions: Face-mask sedation with 1.0% sevoflurane in conjunction with caudal block may be more effective than that with 2.5% sevoflurane in preventing EA.
Competing Interests: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
(Copyright: © Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.)