학술논문

sIgE Ana o 1, 2 and 3 accurately distinguish tolerant from allergic children sensitized to cashew nuts.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
van der Valk JP; Department of Internal Medicine, Allergology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.; Gerth van Wijk R; Department of Internal Medicine, Allergology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.; Vergouwe Y; Center for Medical Decision Making, Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.; Steyerberg EW; Center for Medical Decision Making, Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.; Reitsma M; Wageningen UR Food & Biobased Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.; Wichers HJ; Wageningen UR Food & Biobased Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.; Savelkoul HF; Laboratory of Cell Biology and Immunology, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.; Vlieg-Boerstra B; Department of Paediatrics, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis (OLVG), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.; de Groot H; Department of Pediatric Allergology, Diaconessenhuis Voorburg, RdGG, Delft, The Netherlands.; Dubois AE; Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Pediatric Allergology, University Medical Centre Groningen, GRIAC Research Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.; de Jong NW; Department of Internal Medicine, Allergology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Source
Publisher: Blackwell Scientific Publications Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 8906443 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1365-2222 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 09547894 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Clin Exp Allergy Subsets: MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
Background: The double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge test (DBPCFC) is the gold standard in cashew nut allergy. This test is costly, time consuming and not without side effects. Analysis of IgE reactivity to cashew nut components may reduce the need for food challenge tests.
Methods: In a prospective and multicentre study, children with suspected cashew nut allergy underwent a DBPCFC with cashew nut. Specific IgE to cashew nut and to the components Ana o 1, 2 and 3 were determined. A skin prick test (SPT) with cashew nut extract was performed. The association between the outcome of the food challenge test and specific IgE to Ana o 1, 2 and 3 was assessed with logistic regression analyses, unadjusted and adjusted for other diagnostic variables. Discriminative ability was quantified with a concordance index (c).
Results: A total of 173 children (103 boys, 60%) with a median age of 9 years were included. About 79% had a positive challenge test outcome. A steep rise in the risk of a positive challenge was observed for specific IgE to each individual component Ana o 1, 2 and 3 with estimated risks up to approximately 100%. Median values of Ana o 1, 2, 3 were 1.29 kU/l (range 0-100 kU/l), 4.77 kU/l (range 0-100 kU/l) and 8.33 kU/l (range 0-100 kU/l) respectively and varied significantly (p < 0.001). Specific IgE to Ana o 1, 2 and 3 was better distinguished between cashew-allergic and tolerant children (c = 0.87, 0.85 and 0.89, respectively) than specific IgE to cashew nut or SPT (c = 0.76 and 0.83, respectively).
Conclusion: The major cashew nut allergens Ana o 1, 2 and 3 are each individually predictive for the outcome of food challenge tests in cashew-allergic children.
(© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)