학술논문

Use of Population-Level Administrative Data in Developmental Science.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Milne BJ; School of Social Sciences and Centre of Methods and Policy Application in the Social Sciences (COMPASS), University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.; D'Souza S; School of Social Sciences and Centre of Methods and Policy Application in the Social Sciences (COMPASS), University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.; Andersen SH; Rockwool Foundation Research Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark.; Richmond-Rakerd LS; Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Source
Publisher: Annual Reviews Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101760962 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2640-7922 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 26407922 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Annu Rev Dev Psychol Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
Population-level administrative data-data on individuals' interactions with administrative systems (e.g., health, criminal justice, and education)-have substantially advanced our understanding of life-course development. In this review, we focus on five areas where research using these data has made significant contributions to developmental science: ( a ) understanding small or difficult-to-study populations, ( b ) evaluating intergenerational and family influences, ( c ) enabling estimation of causal effects through natural experiments and regional comparisons, ( d ) identifying individuals at risk for negative developmental outcomes, and ( e ) assessing neighborhood and environmental influences. Further advances will be made by linking prospective surveys to administrative data to expand the range of developmental questions that can be tested; supporting efforts to establish new linked administrative data resources, including in developing countries; and conducting cross-national comparisons to test findings' generalizability. New administrative data initiatives should involve consultation with population subgroups including vulnerable groups, efforts to obtain social license, and strong ethical oversight and governance arrangements.