학술논문

Functional Magnetic Resonance Urography in Children-Tips and Pitfalls.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Grzywińska M; Applied Cognitive Neuroscience Lab., Department of Neurophysiology, Neuropsychology and Neuroinformatics, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.; Świętoń D; 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.; Sabisz A; 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.; Piskunowicz M; 1st Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-210 Gdansk, Poland.
Source
Publisher: MDPI AG Country of Publication: Switzerland NLM ID: 101658402 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 2075-4418 (Print) Linking ISSN: 20754418 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Diagnostics (Basel) Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
2075-4418
Abstract
MR urography can be an alternative to other imaging methods of the urinary tract in children. However, this examination may present technical problems influencing further results. Special attention must be paid to the parameters of dynamic sequences to obtain valuable data for further functional analysis. The analysis of methodology for renal function assessment using 3T magnetic resonance in children. A retrospective analysis of MR urography studies was performed in a group of 91 patients. Particular attention was paid to the acquisition parameters of the 3D-Thrive dynamic with contrast medium administration as a basic urography sequence. The authors have evaluated images qualitatively and compared contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), curves smoothness, and quality of baseline (evaluation signal noise ratio) in every dynamic in each patient in every protocol used in our institution. Quality analysis of the image (ICC = 0.877, p < 0.001) was improved so that we have a statistically significant difference in image quality between protocols (χ 2 (3) = 20.134, p < 0.001). The results obtained for SNR in the medulla and cortex show that there was a statistically significant difference in SNR in the cortex (χ 2 (3) = 9.060, p = 0.029). Therefore, the obtained results show that with the newer protocol, we obtain lower values of standard deviation for TTP in the aorta (in ChopfMRU: first protocol SD = 14.560 vs. fourth protocol SD = 5.599; in IntelliSpace Portal: first protocol SD = 15.241 vs. fourth protocol SD = 5.506). Magnetic resonance urography is a promising technique with a few challenges that arise and need to be overcome. New technical opportunities should be introduced for everyday practice to improve MRU results.