학술논문

Closing the gap between acceptable and ideal in catheterisation for paediatric and congenital heart disease-A global view.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Michel-Behnke I; Pediatric Heart Center Vienna, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University Hospital for Children and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.; Kumar RK; Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Cochin, KL, India.; Justo R; Queensland Children's Hospital, University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Australia.; Zabal C; CMO Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez, Mexico City, Mexico.; Marshall AC; Hospital for Sick Children and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.; Jacobs JP; Congenital Heart Center, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Departments of Surgery and Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Source
Publisher: Cambridge University Press Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 9200019 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1467-1107 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 10479511 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Cardiol Young Subsets: MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
In recent issues of the Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Interventions , Holzer and colleagues presented an Expert Consensus Document titled: " PICS / AEPC / APPCS / CSANZ / SCAI / SOLACI: Expert consensus statement on cardiac catheterization for pediatric patients and adults with congenital heart disease. " This Expert Consensus Document is a massively important contribution to the community of paediatric and congenital cardiac care. This document was developed as an Expert Consensus Document by the Pediatric and Congenital Interventional Cardiovascular Society, the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology, the Asia-Pacific Pediatric Cardiac Society, the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Latin American Society of Interventional Cardiology, as well as the Congenital Cardiac Anesthesia Society and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine.As perfectly stated in the Preamble of this Expert Consensus Document, "This expert consensus document is intended to inform practitioners, payors, hospital administrators and other parties as to the opinion of the aforementioned societies about best practices for cardiac catheterisation and transcatheter management of paediatric and adult patients with congenital heart disease, with added accommodations for resource-limited environments." And, the fact that the authorship of this Expert Consensus Document includes global representation is notable, commendable, and important.This Expert Consensus Document has the potential to fill an important gap for this patient population. National guideline documents for specific aspects of interventions in patients with paediatric heart disease, including training guidelines, do exist. However, this current Expert Consensus Document authored by Holzer and colleagues provides truly globally applicable standards on cardiac catheterisation for both paediatric patients and adults with congenital heart disease (CHD).Our current Editorial provides different regional perspectives from senior physicians dedicated to paediatric and congenital cardiac care who are practicing in Europe, the Asia-Pacific region, Latin America, Australia/New Zealand, and North America. Establishing worldwide standards for cardiac catheterisation laboratories for children and adults with CHD is a significant stride towards improving the quality and consistency of care. These standards should not only reflect the current state of medical knowledge but should also be adaptable to future advancements, ultimately fostering better outcomes and enhancing the lives of individuals affected by CHD worldwide.Ensuring that these standards are accessible and adaptable across different healthcare settings globally is a critical step. Given the variability in resources and infrastructure globally, the need exists for flexibility and tailoring to implement recommendations.The potential impact of the Expert Consensus Document and its recommendations is likely significant, but heterogeneity of healthcare systems will pose continuing challenges on healthcare professionals. Indeed, this heterogeneity of healthcare systems will challenge healthcare professionals to finally close the gap between acceptable and ideal in the catheterisation of patients with paediatric and/or congenital heart disease.