학술논문
Adequacy of thyroid hormone replacement for people with hypothyroidism in real-world settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Efthymiadis A; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.; Henry M; Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.; Spinos D; Gloucester NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, UK.; Bourlaki M; Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.; Tsikopoulos A; 1st Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, AHEPA University General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Kiriakidi 1, Thessaloniki, Greece.; Bourazana A; 2nd Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece.; Bastounis A; School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), Regent Court, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.; Tsikopoulos K; Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Source
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 0346653 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1365-2265 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 03000664 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Subsets: MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
Objective: Thyroid hormone under-replacement and over-replacement are associated with adverse health outcomes. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the extent of thyroid hormone replacement adequacy for patients with known hypothyroidism in real-word settings, excluding those receiving thyroid hormone suppressive therapy as thyroid cancer treatment.
Design: Four electronic databases (Embase [Ovid], Medline [Ovid], PubMed and SCOPUS) were searched for published and unpublished observational studies until 12 December 2022. The results of the studies were meta-analysed to calculate pooled prevalence estimates for thyroid hormone supplementation adequacy, over-replacement and under-replacement. Quality assessment of studies was performed using the Joanna-Briggs appraisal tool for prevalence studies.
Results: Seven studies with a total of 4230 patients were eligible for quantitative synthesis. The pooled prevalence estimates of adequate thyroid replacement, over-replacement and under-replacement were 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49-0.60, p = .001), 0.20 (95% CI: 0.14-0.27, p = .001) and 0.24 (95% CI: 0.13-0.36, p = .001), respectively. Four studies subclassified hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism into overt and subclinical. The pooled prevalence of overt and subclinical hyperthyroidism was 0.04 (95% CI: 0.00-0.11, p = .01) and 0.17 (95% CI: 0.09-0.27 p = .001), respectively. For overt and subclinical hypothyroidism, the pooled prevalence was 0.02 (95% CI: 0.01-0.03, p = .001) and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.12-0.29, p = .001), respectively.
Conclusions: On average, approximately half of patients with hypothyroidism are only treated to target euthyroidism. In real-world practice, a significant number of patients are over-treated or under-treated, leading to adverse healthcare outcomes. It is imperative that more effective thyroid monitoring strategies be implemented, with an emphasis on primary care thyroid function monitoring, to minimise inappropriate thyroid replacement treatments and optimise healthcare outcomes at a population level.
(© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
Design: Four electronic databases (Embase [Ovid], Medline [Ovid], PubMed and SCOPUS) were searched for published and unpublished observational studies until 12 December 2022. The results of the studies were meta-analysed to calculate pooled prevalence estimates for thyroid hormone supplementation adequacy, over-replacement and under-replacement. Quality assessment of studies was performed using the Joanna-Briggs appraisal tool for prevalence studies.
Results: Seven studies with a total of 4230 patients were eligible for quantitative synthesis. The pooled prevalence estimates of adequate thyroid replacement, over-replacement and under-replacement were 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49-0.60, p = .001), 0.20 (95% CI: 0.14-0.27, p = .001) and 0.24 (95% CI: 0.13-0.36, p = .001), respectively. Four studies subclassified hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism into overt and subclinical. The pooled prevalence of overt and subclinical hyperthyroidism was 0.04 (95% CI: 0.00-0.11, p = .01) and 0.17 (95% CI: 0.09-0.27 p = .001), respectively. For overt and subclinical hypothyroidism, the pooled prevalence was 0.02 (95% CI: 0.01-0.03, p = .001) and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.12-0.29, p = .001), respectively.
Conclusions: On average, approximately half of patients with hypothyroidism are only treated to target euthyroidism. In real-world practice, a significant number of patients are over-treated or under-treated, leading to adverse healthcare outcomes. It is imperative that more effective thyroid monitoring strategies be implemented, with an emphasis on primary care thyroid function monitoring, to minimise inappropriate thyroid replacement treatments and optimise healthcare outcomes at a population level.
(© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)