학술논문
The Oxford Face Matching Test: Short-form alternative.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Stantić M; Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.; Knyspel J; Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.; Gaches A; Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.; Liu Y; Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.; Bird G; Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.; Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.; Catmur C; Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Source
Publisher: Sage in association with Experimental Psychology Society Country of Publication: England NLM ID: 101259775 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1747-0226 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 17470218 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) Subsets: MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
A recently published test of face perception, the Oxford Face Matching Test, asks participants to make two judgements: whether two faces are of the same individual and how perceptually similar the two faces are. In this study, we sought to determine to what extent the test can be shortened by removing the perceptual similarity judgements and whether this affects test performance. In Experiment 1, participants completed two versions of the test, with and without similarity judgements, in separate sessions in counterbalanced order. The version without similarity judgements took approximately 40% less time to complete. Performance on the matching judgements did not differ across versions and the correlation in accuracy across the two versions was comparable with the originally reported test-retest reliability value. Experiment 2 validated the version without similarity judgements against other measures, demonstrating moderate relationships with other face matching, memory, and self-report face perception measures. These data indicate that a test version without the similarity judgements can substantially reduce administration time without affecting test performance.
Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.