학술논문

Rethinking malaria: Governance lessons from other disease programs.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Ohiri K; Health Strategy and Delivery Foundation, Abuja, Nigeria.; Harvard T. H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.; Aniebo I; Health Strategy and Delivery Foundation, Abuja, Nigeria.; Harvard T. H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.; Akinlade O; Health Strategy and Delivery Foundation, Abuja, Nigeria.; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.
Source
Publisher: Public Library of Science Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 9918283779606676 Publication Model: eCollection Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 2767-3375 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 27673375 NLM ISO Abbreviation: PLOS Glob Public Health Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
The global disruptions brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic as well as the stagnation of progress of global malaria elimination efforts have provided an opportunity to rethink several aspects of the global malaria program, including its governance at all levels, from the community to the nation and to the world. Approaching this issue requires an examination of the critical governance factors that affect malaria elimination as well as lessons that could be learned from the governance of other global health programs. The paper, therefore, first reviews malaria program governance challenges at the global, national, and sub-national levels. We then conducted a literature review of governance factors that affected four major global disease elimination programs; (1) the global smallpox eradication program; (2) polio eradication efforts (focus on Latin America); (3) the onchocerciasis eradication program; and (4) global COVID-19 pandemic control efforts. Based on this review, we identified eight comment governance themes that impact disease elimination programs. These include 1) International support and coordination; 2) Financing; 3) Data use for engagement and decision making, 4) Country ownership; 5) National program structure and management, 6) Community support/engagement; 7) Multisectoral engagement; and 8) Technology and innovation The paper then illustrates how these eight governance themes were factored in the four disease control programs, draws lessons and insights about the role of governance from these programs and outlines the implications for governance of malaria elimination efforts. The paper concludes by making recommendations for improving governance of malaria elimination programs and how the analyses of other global disease control programs can provide new ideas and inspiration for a more robust push towards malaria eradication.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
(Copyright: © 2022 Ohiri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)