학술논문
Comparing the Long-term Success Rates of Immediate Implant Placement vs. Delayed Implant Placement in Patients with Periodontally Compromised Teeth.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Author
Alam MK; Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia.; Department of Dental Research Cell, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.; Department of Public Health, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Daffodil International University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.; Bagde HS; Professor, Department of Periodontology, CDCRI, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, India.; Alhamwan AKA; Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia.; Aljubab HMH; Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia.; Alrashedi FFA; Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia.; Aljameeli DHM; Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia.; Sghaireen MG; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Source
Publisher: Medknow Publications Country of Publication: India NLM ID: 101537209 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 0976-4879 (Print) Linking ISSN: 09757406 NLM ISO Abbreviation: J Pharm Bioallied Sci Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
0976-4879
Abstract
Background: This study aims to compare the long-term success rates of immediate implant placement and delayed implant placement in patients with periodontally compromised teeth.
Materials and Methods: A total of 30 patients presenting with periodontally compromised teeth requiring extraction and subsequent implant placement were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups based on the timing of implant placement: Group A (immediate implant placement) and Group B (delayed implant placement). Implants were placed according to standard protocols. Patient records were reviewed for implant survival, peri-implant bone loss, and prosthetic complications. Data were statistically analyzed using appropriate tests.
Results: The mean follow-up period was 5 years. In Group A, the implant survival rate was 90%, while in Group B, it was 83%. The mean peri-implant bone loss was 1.5 mm in Group A and 2.2 mm in Group B. Prosthetic complications were observed in three cases in Group A and five cases in Group B. The differences in implant survival and bone loss between the two groups were not statistically significant ( P > 0.05).
Conclusion: Both immediate implant placement and delayed implant placement demonstrated comparable long-term success rates in patients with periodontally compromised teeth.
Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.
(Copyright: © 2024 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences.)
Materials and Methods: A total of 30 patients presenting with periodontally compromised teeth requiring extraction and subsequent implant placement were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups based on the timing of implant placement: Group A (immediate implant placement) and Group B (delayed implant placement). Implants were placed according to standard protocols. Patient records were reviewed for implant survival, peri-implant bone loss, and prosthetic complications. Data were statistically analyzed using appropriate tests.
Results: The mean follow-up period was 5 years. In Group A, the implant survival rate was 90%, while in Group B, it was 83%. The mean peri-implant bone loss was 1.5 mm in Group A and 2.2 mm in Group B. Prosthetic complications were observed in three cases in Group A and five cases in Group B. The differences in implant survival and bone loss between the two groups were not statistically significant ( P > 0.05).
Conclusion: Both immediate implant placement and delayed implant placement demonstrated comparable long-term success rates in patients with periodontally compromised teeth.
Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.
(Copyright: © 2024 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences.)