학술논문

Comparison of Tracer Kinetic Models for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET in Intermediate Risk Primary Prostate Cancer Patients.
Document Type
Author
Smith NJ; Indiana University School of Medicine.; Green MA; Indiana University School of Medicine.; Bahler CD; Indiana University School of Medicine.; Tann M; Indiana University School of Medicine.; Territo W; Indiana University School of Medicine.; Smith AM; Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc: Siemens Healthcare USA.; Hutchins GD; Indiana University School of Medicine.
Source
Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 101768035 Publication Model: Electronic Cited Medium: Internet NLM ISO Abbreviation: Res Sq Subsets: PubMed not MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
Abstract
Background: 68 Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography enables the detection of primary, recurrent, and metastatic prostate cancer. Regional radiopharmaceutical uptake is generally evaluated in static images and quantified as standard uptake values (SUV) for clinical decision-making. However, analysis of dynamic images characterizing both tracer uptake and pharmacokinetics may offer added insights into the underlying tissue pathophysiology. This study was undertaken to evaluate the suitability of various kinetic models for 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET analysis. Twenty-three lesions in 18 patients were included in a retrospective kinetic evaluation of 55-minute dynamic 68 Ga-PSMA-11 pre-prostatectomy PET scans from patients with biopsy-demonstrated intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer. A reversible one-tissue compartment model, irreversible two-tissue compartment model, and a reversible two-tissue compartment model were evaluated for their goodness-of-fit to lesion and normal reference prostate time-activity curves. Kinetic parameters obtained through graphical analysis and tracer kinetic modeling techniques were compared for reference prostate tissue and lesion regions of interest.
Results: Supported by goodness-of-fit and information loss criteria, the irreversible two-tissue compartment model was selected as optimally fitting the time-activity curves. Lesions exhibited significant differences in kinetic rate constants (K 1 , k 2 , k 3 , Ki) and semiquantitative measures (SUV) when compared with reference prostatic tissue. The two-tissue irreversible tracer kinetic model was consistently appropriate across prostatic zones.
Conclusions: An irreversible tracer kinetic model is appropriate for dynamic analysis of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET images. Kinetic parameters estimated by Patlak graphical analysis or full compartmental analysis can distinguish tumor from normal prostate tissue.
Competing Interests: Competing Interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Online Access