학술논문
Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a low resource setting: a 5-year analysis.
Document Type
Academic Journal
Source
Publisher: The Association Country of Publication: Nigeria NLM ID: 100888321 Publication Model: Print Cited Medium: Print ISSN: 1115-2613 (Print) Linking ISSN: 11152613 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Niger J Med Subsets: MEDLINE
Subject
Language
English
ISSN
1115-2613
Abstract
Background: Emergency peripartum hysterectomy (EPH) is an important life saving surgical procedure often necessitated by life threatening obstetric haemorrhage. The indications for peripartum hysterectomy differs between develop and developing countries and may reflect the level of obstetric practice in a region.
Patients and Methods: This was a 5-year retrospective study. The medical records of patients who had emergency peripartum hysterectomy at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital were reviewed and relevant data were retrieved and analyzed.
Results: Sixty two cases of peripartum hysterectomy were performed giving a prevalence rate of 0.38% out of 16,113 total deliveries. Being unbooked was significantly associated with peripartum hysterectomy (x2 = 85.29, p = 0.0000). Peripartum hysterectomy was performed for 20.3% of nulliparous women. Subtotal hysterectomy accounted for 55.9% while total hysterectomy was performed for 44.1% of cases. The commonest indication for peripartum hysterectomy was uterine rupture (57.6%). There was no case of ureteric injury Unbooked mothers were 28 times more likely to die than booked mothers. Unbooked status was significantly associated with maternal mortality (p = 0.00008) and perinatal mortality (p = 0.00000).
Conclusion: Emergency peripartum hysterectomy still remains indispensible in obstetric practice in low resource setting. Labour and delivery when well supervised will reduce the need for emergency peripartum hysterectomy. Training of specialist in the skill of internal iliac artery ligation is recommended.
Patients and Methods: This was a 5-year retrospective study. The medical records of patients who had emergency peripartum hysterectomy at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital were reviewed and relevant data were retrieved and analyzed.
Results: Sixty two cases of peripartum hysterectomy were performed giving a prevalence rate of 0.38% out of 16,113 total deliveries. Being unbooked was significantly associated with peripartum hysterectomy (x2 = 85.29, p = 0.0000). Peripartum hysterectomy was performed for 20.3% of nulliparous women. Subtotal hysterectomy accounted for 55.9% while total hysterectomy was performed for 44.1% of cases. The commonest indication for peripartum hysterectomy was uterine rupture (57.6%). There was no case of ureteric injury Unbooked mothers were 28 times more likely to die than booked mothers. Unbooked status was significantly associated with maternal mortality (p = 0.00008) and perinatal mortality (p = 0.00000).
Conclusion: Emergency peripartum hysterectomy still remains indispensible in obstetric practice in low resource setting. Labour and delivery when well supervised will reduce the need for emergency peripartum hysterectomy. Training of specialist in the skill of internal iliac artery ligation is recommended.